__________________________
@brooklynmagi I believe that at least half of them know as well. I have someone arguing with me about this very topic on my Rihanna video. I believe that some are under a type of spell but I do believe that many of them are straight sellouts!
_________________
_______________
In fact, Adolph Hitler belonged to the EXTREME RIGHT--and identified himself as such. Hence he was an ally of other right wing extremists like Franco and Mussolini. And there was support for these fascists among a part of conservative America in those days. Even the conservative Prime Minister Winston Churchill had fond words to say about Hitler before he felt threatened by Hitler military adventures. A lot of conservatives in Germany within the business community felt that Hitler was a useful tool againsts socialists, communists, trade unionists, dissident liberal intellectuals, and various other groups whom the American right also loves to hate.
Conservatives are informed and, unlike many liberals, not afraid to think for themselves.
The defining charactistic of 20th and now 21st Century liberals is their blind devotion to big government.
Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Obama, Hugo Chavez and Saddam Hussein were all far more to the left than the Founding Fathers and the average American.
Lefties may not believe in God, but they do beleive in Heaven.
Or at least heaven on earth after they have driven all the conservatives out of our society.
Moreover, Hugo Chavez is not a Marxist-Leninist like Stalin or Mao. He does seem to be a socialist. Barack Obama is neither a Marxist nor a socialist. Saddam Hussein was neither a socialist nor a Marxist, but a fascist. He brutally crushed socialists and communists and trade unionists, and received considerable support from our CIA to carry out his repressive tasks.(CIA also helped train Saddam Hussein's intelligence forces, and I seem to remember that it was a conservative official of the Reagan administration who described Saddam Hussein as a "moderating influence in the middle east.").
The fact that you lump together men of WIDELY different political and philosophical persuasions and affliations--including people who were utterly antagonistic to each other--suggests that at least in your case Conservatives are RIDICULOUSLY UNINFORMED and either unwilling or unable to think at all. Unfortunately, backward, uninformed and mindless conservatives like you are more COMMON that one would like to believe.
-Savant
___________
Dec 1 2011 - 7:21am
What Mr Husseini is outlining is the difference between a Real Journalist & a presstitute. The hypocrisy of US & NATO & their MSNM Media presstitutes [including Al-Jazeera] regarding the Saudis & Bahrainis vs Syria, Libya & Iran is obvious & stunning!
On a slightly different Note: In May 2009 I watched a 'Face the Nation' interview [I think the CBS guy was Bob Schieffer] w Dick 'Darth-Vader' Cheney talking about Cheney's role in approving [authorizing it & now boasting about it] water-boarding & other Extreme Interrogation Techniques [IE: TORTURE] on KSM, etc. He responded that the 'Program Was so effective because it "Saved Lives" ' & that 'KSM was an evil man- the mastermind of 9-11 that "Blew-Up the WTC"... ' Schieffer went on about how water-boarding is now seen as torture [DUH] IE: pretending to ask tough questions. MY first reaction when Cheney said this was: 1} If KSM was the mastermind of 9-11 & the number 3 guy in Al Qeada behind Osama bin Laden {whose legend was just 'officially' killed off this past May} & Ayman al-Zawahiri- & thus had direct access to them & water-boarding was so effective that it saved lives- then why hadn't the Bush / Cheney gang caught &/or killed neither bin Laden nor al-Zawahiri [Remember 'Wanted Dead or Alive' & 'We gonna smoke em out of their caves...']?! 2nd} NIST had recently issued their final report about the collapses of WTC 1, 2 & 7 where they concluded [if you believe them] that those WTC's had Definitely NOT been BLOWN-UP! My question to Darth-Vader 'Dick' would have been did you not know about the NIST report, then why are you contradicting it by saying that the WTC had been BLOWN-UP?!
On a slightly different Note: In May 2009 I watched a 'Face the Nation' interview [I think the CBS guy was Bob Schieffer] w Dick 'Darth-Vader' Cheney talking about Cheney's role in approving [authorizing it & now boasting about it] water-boarding & other Extreme Interrogation Techniques [IE: TORTURE] on KSM, etc. He responded that the 'Program Was so effective because it "Saved Lives" ' & that 'KSM was an evil man- the mastermind of 9-11 that "Blew-Up the WTC"... ' Schieffer went on about how water-boarding is now seen as torture [DUH] IE: pretending to ask tough questions. MY first reaction when Cheney said this was: 1} If KSM was the mastermind of 9-11 & the number 3 guy in Al Qeada behind Osama bin Laden {whose legend was just 'officially' killed off this past May} & Ayman al-Zawahiri- & thus had direct access to them & water-boarding was so effective that it saved lives- then why hadn't the Bush / Cheney gang caught &/or killed neither bin Laden nor al-Zawahiri [Remember 'Wanted Dead or Alive' & 'We gonna smoke em out of their caves...']?! 2nd} NIST had recently issued their final report about the collapses of WTC 1, 2 & 7 where they concluded [if you believe them] that those WTC's had Definitely NOT been BLOWN-UP! My question to Darth-Vader 'Dick' would have been did you not know about the NIST report, then why are you contradicting it by saying that the WTC had been BLOWN-UP?!
Not all whites are bad, even Malcolm X is personally educated on the issue, and the reason he changed his religion; because its' teachings were inaccurate. Amerikkka government teaches all race, color, and creed to fear one another to keep the real civil revolution focus against them. Instead, the people fight amongst each other; government job well done - so don't be fooled. Research Cointelpro. Peace!
________________
oh yes you can and bring back the genuine Republicans of the Grant era, put some Southern states under the military administration and much more Black people in the local assemblies.
The present false Republicans but true Corporate carpets and racist dummies would join the ol' Southern "Dems" quickly.
You would call Dwight Eisenhower a Commie today in a tea-party or Nuts Gingrinch meetings. Those are true "skunks" (in their racist mindset) and certainly blatant "idiots" (in economy and foreign policy).
a whiteboi
-attai1
__________
Once more for the record: The Nazis IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES as right wingers, and white OPENLY and EXPLICITLY warred against the left. They SAID (many times) that the loathes liberalism because in their minds it led to socialism and communism. And they saw (and SAID that they saw) the Jews as evil carriers of the disease of liberalism. Liberalism with its emphasis on equality and freedom for all led, so the Nazis thought, to even more radical ideas of equality and freedom that evolved into Marxism.
Moreover, liberal and Marxist ideas alike reject ideas of RACIAL SUPREMACY that were cornerstones of Nazi ideology. But German fascists also knew that in Europe, including the Germany, socialism was much or popular with the masses than in America. Hence they found it tactical to adopt the label NATIONAL socialism as a deceptive phrase, but which emphasized NATIONALISM over CLASS. Anyone who knows anything about modern socialism knows that socialism emerges historically out of the struggles of the popular classes for freedom from feudal and capitalist class oppression.
And it attempts to go beyond liberal limitations of "bourgeois democracy" to a more radical democracy of a cooperative society.
Now what's disturbing is that I find that ONLY in America must one explain as simply as possible these ELEMENTARY facts about history and traditions of sociopolitical thought.
CLR James was right: We are technologically advanced, but socially and politically backward in our development as a nation.
-Savant
_______________
This Congress and the Rep-tea-party candidates are indeed even more fanatical Zionists than the Prime minister of Israel.
A colony of Israel? That's what white supremacists in the USA say.... the USA govt is ZOG (zionists occupational govt).
Yet again your attitudes show up as more in line with Nazis than any "left".
You do not listen to US politics ?
The absurd, insane and btw traitorous statements of Nuts Gingrich, Romney and Bachmann were a proof for the universe.
Believe me the insanity of these statements, their overt anti-Arab racism, have shocked deeply outside the USA : European media have all underlined that as another proof of the madness of all Republican candidates.
i have recognized your own statements in the crazy Nuts Gingrich speech so i bet it was AIPAC written.
Or are you the personal writer of Nuts Gingrich ?
a whiteboi
-attai1
Herudagod wrote:
And they funny part is that they always want to excuse blacks as playing the race card, but always have an excuse when they are caught doing something
_______________________
The author of the article Altenet.org article in this thread notes that the more intelligent, articulate and rational Obama is, the more these backward white reactionaries feel aggrieved. It is as if an intelligent black man has caused them to be afflicted with an inferiority complex. Come to think of it: I wonder if it's just a complex?
-Savant
_____________
Nope. Anything shining light on coonery is immediately frowned upon by those in power.
However, if you tap dance and create bowls of steaming pigshit like Tyler Perry, you're showered with awards and praise.
Denzel put on an outstanding performance in Malcolm X. Received nothing.
He played a crooked cop (look up Rafael Perez and the Rampart scandal. Much of training day came from that) and received an award for it.
-Brother Meph (I don't agree with all of his views on women, but he's right on this issue)
Co-sign this.
There's a big damned problem when "Great Debaters" makes only about twice it's budget while "Soul Plane" makes 113 million.
-koolkc107
____________
I've heard a Klansman quote Martin Luther King, Jr and a Christian minister quote Nietzsche. But what were they getting at? What points were they making.
Indeed, what was the TOPIC of Mary Dunn's comments? Do you even know? And what was the quote? What was the point of her mentioning it? Did SHE say that Mao was her favorite philosopher? Literally?
I can remember reading Tom Paine writings in which he quoted he chief adversary: King George III. Of course, I READ Tom Paine and could see what he was getting at?
Conservatives these days are so mentally challenged. Once I as a student I was seen with a copy of WRITINGS OF THE YOUNG MARX ON PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY. A conservative fellow student wanted to know why I'd read that Commie. "Are you a Communist?" He failed to notice that I was also reading Descartes DISCOURSE ON METHOD and Augustine's CONFESSIONS. Strange he did get upset about that and query whether I was a Cartesian or an Augustinian Christian.
How sad. And to think there used to be a considerable number of INTELLIGENT conservatives. Once conservatives were worthy adversaries. They could pit Burke against Tom Paine.
Now the intelligent conservatives who remain have been marginalized by far right nutcases and reactionary bimbos. How sad.
-Savant
I'm wondering: What do you READ? Have you read the writings of Jefferson? Or Madison? Or even Barack Obama? Have you read Stalin or Mao? Can you SHOW--not merely SAY--that Obama's idea of government is essentially the same as theirs. What is it in Obama's writicngs SPECIFICALLY that puts him in the same category with Mao and Stalin? Let me suggest that you at least read Chapter 2 ("Values") of Barack Obama's book THE AUDACITY OF HOPE.
And you can't tell the difference between Obama and Mao, well....I guess it's because you don't know much about either of them.
And Hitler???? A man who would have EXTERMINATED Blacks in America (as he did the few blacks that were in Germany) had he won the war? You equate Obama with Hitler? I'm beginning to think that you're not only uninformed but suffering from some mind altering drug.
-Savant
________________
CobaltBlu
2 days ago
_______________
-WDC
______________
Thomas Jefferson--slaveholder that he was--nonetheless identified with the Englightenment. Anyone who reads Jefferson and other founders of the republic, and who also reads the works of Enlightnement philosophers, can hardly miss this.
Barack Obama, as anyone who has read HIS writings, also identifies himeself with the basic values of the Enlightenment whicvh constitutes the philosoophical basis of the republic.
And, unlike yourself, Barack Obama (though not a philosopher) has actually taken the trouble to read philosophers of the Enlightenment as well as Lincoln, Jefferson, Madison's FEDERALIST PAPERS, etc.
Adolph Hitler, as Nazi, REJECTED and OPPOSED the philosophy of the Enlightenment (of which I doubt that he was much knowledgeable anyway). Joseph Stalin, since he claimed to be a Marxist, PRETENDED to believe in the humanist Enlightenment values inherited from Marx.
In some respects, he was like Rosbespierre who claimed to be committed to Enlightenment values of freedom and equality while repressing and drowning his country with blood.
Slalin claimed to be committed t a cooperative society with equality and freedom from class oppression and political despotism (Marx expected the state to wither away) but created NEW forms of class oppression and a state which, instead of being a democratic tool of the working class, became instead their murderous and exploiting master.
Your inclination to lump things together in complete disregard for relevant distinctions and very REAL differences, shows a lack of knowledge of society, history, and even very basic politics or political ideas.
Tell me: Have you read any books? Do you STUDY at all?
-Savant
_______________________
Iwillbfree5 months ago
_______________
Maybe, but it's a fact that we derived from other West African tribes as well. I have seen pictures of the Igbo and can see the resemblance of them and other AA's that I see. I also looked at some of the Hausa films on youtube and burst into laughter because alot of the women on there singing look like so many of the women that I have seen that are AA's. I am tall and thin, w/a lanky build and mostly legs, and I saw a lot of the women on Hausa movies that were like that. Are those tribes related in any way? I haven't taken the time out to find out more information on the slave trade, shame on me.
-Michelle Kia
5 months ago
Fascists have historically taken power whenever democratic socialist victories are imminent or already accomplished. This has occurred in Spain, Italy, Germany, Guatemala, Chile, Indonesia, Zaire and many others.
They support the interests of the ruling classes against the real socialism, whether that is in the form of democratic liberal socialism or Marxist-Leninist Stalinism. They have opposed violently any kind of unionization or liberal or leftist social movement.
They were defeated in France only by a bloody revolution, and worldwide the constant tension between the exploiters and the exploited masses keeps the world off-balance and people in need.
The USA version of fascists are in the Republican Party mostly, along with a small number in ultra-right political nutcase groups like the National Alliance.
-Barros Serrano
____________
You don't mention the SOURCE. However,m uch of it sounds like speeches I heard given by Ronald Reagan in the 1980s! LOL! Especially regarding religion and national resurgence.
I note that there's no talk of unity of the working class, or of workers and peasants. I notice there's no talking of expropriating or even curtailing the bourgeoisie. There's certainly no talk of CLASS struggle which would have been common among the LEFT, both Marxist and non-Marxist. And I read nothing about overturning capitalism in favor of a democratic government of workers and peasants.
The emphasis is on RIGHT WIGN NATIONALISM and RACE (though the latter is not specifically mentioned there).
Read both Marxist and non-Marxist socialists, and compare their writings with Fascistic writings. And if you STILL can't tell the difference, consider getting professional counseling.
(Also, when you quote something you're supposed to identify and cite the source with bibliographic information that the reader can check.)
-Savant
____________
Sangelia, I believe that it is the responsibility of every man walking this Earth, Black or non-Black, to protect his women and children. If a man cannot do this, then he is not a man. And if that means using deadly force, then use it. This is why I own a gun, and intend to buy many more in the future. A real husband or father prepares for danger BEFORE that danger appears. Now Sangelia, in my previous posts to you, if you read carefully, you will notice I mentioned getting my SHOT GUN if my home was invaded. I never mentioned anything about a rifle. Why did I say shot gun? Because a shot gun is the perfect gun for home defense. You don't want a rifle because rifles were originally designed to be used outside, not inside. How do I know this? Because I read, and all men should know these things. A shot gun is a close to medium ranged weapon that has incredible power. I prefer shot guns inside the house because they are great for tight spaces. I also like shot gun rounds because they spread and can hit multiple targets. Plus, a 20 or 12 gauge shot gun will render body armor useless(shot gun rounds may not go through the vest, but the force of impact will penetrate and can cause the chest to cave in, killing the man wearing it). A shot gun is your best friend if you're up against three guys in your house wearing armor, and the shot gun I want, which police officers and swat teams use, is the REMINGTON 11-87 Semi-automatic shot gun: Remington 11-87 = Bad ass semi-automatic shot gun http://www.youtube .com/watch?v=iCzHE lgJxWk
-Kashta Bureh (I don't agree with him on every issue, but he is right on this point)
_____________
3 hours ago
Dissent is patriotic. It starts a dialog that can eventually help good things happen. But when someone tries to make their points using racial slurs and outright race related ignorance we should be able to call them a racist without being dismissed as "drinking the kool-aid". I'm not the biggest Obama supporter but I can't stand a bigot. People should be smart enough to make the point they want to make without bringing race into it.
-Keri
______________________
____________________________
The Ibos constituted about about 25% of the slave population in the US. There was only 480,000-500,000 Africans brought to the US. This is about 5% of the total Africans in the Atlantic Slave Trade.
Yes I would agree that Igbos have a big influence on AA society. However, we must not ignore the other very large groups, the Angolans and the Kongos. These groups had a significant contribution to AA socity. They constituted about 30%. So to say that the majority of AAs have Ibo ancestry is incorrect. To say a relatively large percentage of AAs have Ibo ancestry is more valid.
I would suggest y'all read Michael Gomez's Exchanging Our Country Marks and Dreams of Africa in Alabama by Slyvaine Diouf.
Note:
My sister has slanted eyes, and we would make fun of her that she must have some Asian in her. I was ignorant then. When I was in Nigeria and I was on a beach one sunday afternoon, I saw many slanted eyed African Hausa women. I died laughing and had to inform my family.
In regard to the Yoruba there numbers in the US are extremely small, less that 7000. There only influence on AA culture is maybe New Orleans, and that is also attributed the large amount of Haitians that immigrated there after the Haitian Revolution, and in the lower Mississippi. Therefore the Yorubas are in insignificant factor in the the creation of the AAs society. The other groups that I mentioned the Ibos, the Akans, BaKongo, and the Angolans aret the significant groups.
-Big Sistah Pat
________
5 months ago
Iwillbfree5 months ago
sharon
13 hours ago
And they funny part is that they always want to excuse blacks as playing the race card, but always have an excuse when they are caught doing something
_______________________
In fact, there's PLENTY to worry about. Especially since the far right has hijacked the Republican Party, replacing intelligent moderates with right wing morons and fanatics, conservatives not only to worry about Blacks being more intelligent than they--for MOST of us are!---they have to worry about just about EVERYBODY being more intelligent than they.not to much to worry about there
The author of the article Altenet.org article in this thread notes that the more intelligent, articulate and rational Obama is, the more these backward white reactionaries feel aggrieved. It is as if an intelligent black man has caused them to be afflicted with an inferiority complex. Come to think of it: I wonder if it's just a complex?
-Savant
_____________
Nope. Anything shining light on coonery is immediately frowned upon by those in power.
However, if you tap dance and create bowls of steaming pigshit like Tyler Perry, you're showered with awards and praise.
Denzel put on an outstanding performance in Malcolm X. Received nothing.
He played a crooked cop (look up Rafael Perez and the Rampart scandal. Much of training day came from that) and received an award for it.
-Brother Meph (I don't agree with all of his views on women, but he's right on this issue)
Co-sign this.
There's a big damned problem when "Great Debaters" makes only about twice it's budget while "Soul Plane" makes 113 million.
-koolkc107
____________
Yes, and Ho Chi Mihn quoted Jefferson and the Declaration of Independence, Karl Marx quoted Lincoln, Jefferson and Adam Smith.
yes, and obama's advisor anita dunn has quoted her favorite philosopher, mao tse tung. gee, he was so enlightened that he realized his country had 60 million people too many. if you run with the dogs, yer gonna get fleas. obama has surrounded himself with dogs. not very enlightened...
I've heard a Klansman quote Martin Luther King, Jr and a Christian minister quote Nietzsche. But what were they getting at? What points were they making.
Indeed, what was the TOPIC of Mary Dunn's comments? Do you even know? And what was the quote? What was the point of her mentioning it? Did SHE say that Mao was her favorite philosopher? Literally?
I can remember reading Tom Paine writings in which he quoted he chief adversary: King George III. Of course, I READ Tom Paine and could see what he was getting at?
Conservatives these days are so mentally challenged. Once I as a student I was seen with a copy of WRITINGS OF THE YOUNG MARX ON PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY. A conservative fellow student wanted to know why I'd read that Commie. "Are you a Communist?" He failed to notice that I was also reading Descartes DISCOURSE ON METHOD and Augustine's CONFESSIONS. Strange he did get upset about that and query whether I was a Cartesian or an Augustinian Christian.
How sad. And to think there used to be a considerable number of INTELLIGENT conservatives. Once conservatives were worthy adversaries. They could pit Burke against Tom Paine.
Now the intelligent conservatives who remain have been marginalized by far right nutcases and reactionary bimbos. How sad.
-Savant
I'm wondering: What do you READ? Have you read the writings of Jefferson? Or Madison? Or even Barack Obama? Have you read Stalin or Mao? Can you SHOW--not merely SAY--that Obama's idea of government is essentially the same as theirs. What is it in Obama's writicngs SPECIFICALLY that puts him in the same category with Mao and Stalin? Let me suggest that you at least read Chapter 2 ("Values") of Barack Obama's book THE AUDACITY OF HOPE.
And you can't tell the difference between Obama and Mao, well....I guess it's because you don't know much about either of them.
And Hitler???? A man who would have EXTERMINATED Blacks in America (as he did the few blacks that were in Germany) had he won the war? You equate Obama with Hitler? I'm beginning to think that you're not only uninformed but suffering from some mind altering drug.
-Savant
________________
CobaltBlu
2 days ago_______________
Amen!
Well when we watched the howling mobs this summer and compared their antics to the civil and rational discurse of President Obama, the contrast was obvious.
Historically, it has been stereotyped as irrational, animalistic, savage or what have you. One writer notes that in modern "Western culture, blackness is traditionally symbolic of evil, ugliness, filth, wretchedness, decay and death...[B]lacks are associated with bestial physical force, inclinations to violence, simian athletic prowess, and a primitive and rapacious sexuality." One need only visit Topix and notice the frequency with which blacks are referred to as chimps to get the author's point.
Reason, intellect, erudition are thought to be foreign to blacks and black culture. Fanon once noted that in the minds of many whites blacks are impervious to reason, and that reason departs when the Black enters.
But what do you do when faced with highly intelligent, well educated black person who simply by existing make you look like a second or third rate human being--you,who by being white assume that you are members of a master rce? You only scream "racist!"--since accsuing others of being like yourself is the worst charge you can make.
Or you shout "idiot!" at a black person who is way above your own mental level.
Frankly, I think that Obama arouses more hatred than does the half-literate brother from the hood. In the self-deluded minds of the more racist and right wing part of white America, the half-literate brother or the black person with a jail records gives them comforting confirmation of their own benighted presumption of superiority.
But an Obama arouses the most frantic hatreds, the most psychotic panics...And since many whites are moving away from the delusions of white supremacy, I can only imagine that reactionary whites are feeling increasingly marginalized even WITHIN white America.
-WDC
______________
No, YOU'RE mistaken. Indeed there was a DEBATE among the so-called founding fathers about the limits and legitimate powers of government. The unalienable rights which "the laws of Nature and Nature's God" entitles human being refers to the Deist God of the Englightenment.
You are mistaken.
The foundation of enlightenment for the Founding Fathers is the believe in limited government.
They rejected the concept of an all-powerful king who ruled America from London.
The Founders believed that the individual was more important than the state and had inalienable rights bestowed by God.
That is the opposit of what tyrants like Hitler, Stalin, and Obama believe. They want a ruling elited to make all the decisions for everyone else.
And they crushed anyone who stood in their way.
Thomas Jefferson--slaveholder that he was--nonetheless identified with the Englightenment. Anyone who reads Jefferson and other founders of the republic, and who also reads the works of Enlightnement philosophers, can hardly miss this.
Barack Obama, as anyone who has read HIS writings, also identifies himeself with the basic values of the Enlightenment whicvh constitutes the philosoophical basis of the republic.
And, unlike yourself, Barack Obama (though not a philosopher) has actually taken the trouble to read philosophers of the Enlightenment as well as Lincoln, Jefferson, Madison's FEDERALIST PAPERS, etc.
Adolph Hitler, as Nazi, REJECTED and OPPOSED the philosophy of the Enlightenment (of which I doubt that he was much knowledgeable anyway). Joseph Stalin, since he claimed to be a Marxist, PRETENDED to believe in the humanist Enlightenment values inherited from Marx.
In some respects, he was like Rosbespierre who claimed to be committed to Enlightenment values of freedom and equality while repressing and drowning his country with blood.
Slalin claimed to be committed t a cooperative society with equality and freedom from class oppression and political despotism (Marx expected the state to wither away) but created NEW forms of class oppression and a state which, instead of being a democratic tool of the working class, became instead their murderous and exploiting master.
Your inclination to lump things together in complete disregard for relevant distinctions and very REAL differences, shows a lack of knowledge of society, history, and even very basic politics or political ideas.
Tell me: Have you read any books? Do you STUDY at all?
-Savant
_______________________
Iwillbfree
5 months agoWhy are Black writers afraid to mention their names?
THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY THE MEDIA!
M indless
E vil
D evils
I n
A ction
You know negroids can't post the TRUTH! Look how NEWSFUN treats me and the other Rebels, who speak the TRUTH...they erase OUR posts!
Let's not forget about Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, Medgar Evers, and last but not least; the REAL PREACHA OF OUR PEOPLE.....NAT TURNER!!!!
THIS LIST WOULD BE ENDLESS BECAUSE 'ALL BLACK amerikkkan' NAMES SHOULD BE ON THIS LIST!!!!!
THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY THE MEDIA!
M indless
E vil
D evils
I n
A ction
You know negroids can't post the TRUTH! Look how NEWSFUN treats me and the other Rebels, who speak the TRUTH...they erase OUR posts!
Let's not forget about Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, Medgar Evers, and last but not least; the REAL PREACHA OF OUR PEOPLE.....NAT TURNER!!!!
THIS LIST WOULD BE ENDLESS BECAUSE 'ALL BLACK amerikkkan' NAMES SHOULD BE ON THIS LIST!!!!!
_______________
Maybe, but it's a fact that we derived from other West African tribes as well. I have seen pictures of the Igbo and can see the resemblance of them and other AA's that I see. I also looked at some of the Hausa films on youtube and burst into laughter because alot of the women on there singing look like so many of the women that I have seen that are AA's. I am tall and thin, w/a lanky build and mostly legs, and I saw a lot of the women on Hausa movies that were like that. Are those tribes related in any way? I haven't taken the time out to find out more information on the slave trade, shame on me.
-Michelle Kia
5 months agoThey always forget Robert F. Williams:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
Read his book "Negroes with Guns" or the award winning book about him "Radio Free Dixie" and you will see why the U.S. promotes MLK instead. He was truly a revolutionary spirit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
Read his book "Negroes with Guns" or the award winning book about him "Radio Free Dixie" and you will see why the U.S. promotes MLK instead. He was truly a revolutionary spirit.
__________
Fascists have historically taken power whenever democratic socialist victories are imminent or already accomplished. This has occurred in Spain, Italy, Germany, Guatemala, Chile, Indonesia, Zaire and many others.
They support the interests of the ruling classes against the real socialism, whether that is in the form of democratic liberal socialism or Marxist-Leninist Stalinism. They have opposed violently any kind of unionization or liberal or leftist social movement.
They were defeated in France only by a bloody revolution, and worldwide the constant tension between the exploiters and the exploited masses keeps the world off-balance and people in need.
The USA version of fascists are in the Republican Party mostly, along with a small number in ultra-right political nutcase groups like the National Alliance.
-Barros Serrano
____________
You don't mention the SOURCE. However,m uch of it sounds like speeches I heard given by Ronald Reagan in the 1980s! LOL! Especially regarding religion and national resurgence.
I note that there's no talk of unity of the working class, or of workers and peasants. I notice there's no talking of expropriating or even curtailing the bourgeoisie. There's certainly no talk of CLASS struggle which would have been common among the LEFT, both Marxist and non-Marxist. And I read nothing about overturning capitalism in favor of a democratic government of workers and peasants.
The emphasis is on RIGHT WIGN NATIONALISM and RACE (though the latter is not specifically mentioned there).
Read both Marxist and non-Marxist socialists, and compare their writings with Fascistic writings. And if you STILL can't tell the difference, consider getting professional counseling.
(Also, when you quote something you're supposed to identify and cite the source with bibliographic information that the reader can check.)
-Savant
____________
Sangelia, I believe that it is the responsibility of every man walking this Earth, Black or non-Black, to protect his women and children. If a man cannot do this, then he is not a man. And if that means using deadly force, then use it. This is why I own a gun, and intend to buy many more in the future. A real husband or father prepares for danger BEFORE that danger appears. Now Sangelia, in my previous posts to you, if you read carefully, you will notice I mentioned getting my SHOT GUN if my home was invaded. I never mentioned anything about a rifle. Why did I say shot gun? Because a shot gun is the perfect gun for home defense. You don't want a rifle because rifles were originally designed to be used outside, not inside. How do I know this? Because I read, and all men should know these things. A shot gun is a close to medium ranged weapon that has incredible power. I prefer shot guns inside the house because they are great for tight spaces. I also like shot gun rounds because they spread and can hit multiple targets. Plus, a 20 or 12 gauge shot gun will render body armor useless(shot gun rounds may not go through the vest, but the force of impact will penetrate and can cause the chest to cave in, killing the man wearing it). A shot gun is your best friend if you're up against three guys in your house wearing armor, and the shot gun I want, which police officers and swat teams use, is the REMINGTON 11-87 Semi-automatic shot gun: Remington 11-87 = Bad ass semi-automatic shot gun http://www.youtube .com/watch?v=iCzHE lgJxWk
-Kashta Bureh (I don't agree with him on every issue, but he is right on this point)
_____________
3 hours agoWell said. People should be able to disagree and criticize The President without being called a racist. On the same note people shouldn't be dismissed when they call a racist, a racist.I especially like the following comments from this article:
"This African-American man with an Arabic name has dared to usurp all the the CULTURAL and COGNITIVE tropes that white supremacy has historically claimed for itself. He is CALM in the face of their UNRESTRAINED EMOTION. The more ILLOGICAL they act, the more RATIONAL he comes across."
The very contrast between Obama's rationality, his civility and the screaming fanaticism of his right wing white adversaries, give the lie to the myth of white supremacy.
It is Obama's adversaries, not Obama (or blacks) who appear as the SAVAGES.
I've no doubt that they are an embarrassment to all decent and enlightened American whites, including white progressive critics of Obama who can disagree RATIONALLY without all this hatred.
Dissent is patriotic. It starts a dialog that can eventually help good things happen. But when someone tries to make their points using racial slurs and outright race related ignorance we should be able to call them a racist without being dismissed as "drinking the kool-aid". I'm not the biggest Obama supporter but I can't stand a bigot. People should be smart enough to make the point they want to make without bringing race into it.
-Keri
______________________
____________________________
The Ibos constituted about about 25% of the slave population in the US. There was only 480,000-500,000 Africans brought to the US. This is about 5% of the total Africans in the Atlantic Slave Trade.
Yes I would agree that Igbos have a big influence on AA society. However, we must not ignore the other very large groups, the Angolans and the Kongos. These groups had a significant contribution to AA socity. They constituted about 30%. So to say that the majority of AAs have Ibo ancestry is incorrect. To say a relatively large percentage of AAs have Ibo ancestry is more valid.
I would suggest y'all read Michael Gomez's Exchanging Our Country Marks and Dreams of Africa in Alabama by Slyvaine Diouf.
Note:
My sister has slanted eyes, and we would make fun of her that she must have some Asian in her. I was ignorant then. When I was in Nigeria and I was on a beach one sunday afternoon, I saw many slanted eyed African Hausa women. I died laughing and had to inform my family.
In regard to the Yoruba there numbers in the US are extremely small, less that 7000. There only influence on AA culture is maybe New Orleans, and that is also attributed the large amount of Haitians that immigrated there after the Haitian Revolution, and in the lower Mississippi. Therefore the Yorubas are in insignificant factor in the the creation of the AAs society. The other groups that I mentioned the Ibos, the Akans, BaKongo, and the Angolans aret the significant groups.
-Big Sistah Pat
________
5 months ago_________
Iwillbfree
5 months agoI see you have been BRAINWASHED with this 'Afrikans selling their own people' bull___. I hate to repeat myself, but if you read some of my other comments,that I have posted, you will see how this LIE came about! You know the old saying, "He who controls the pen controls your mind," and evidently, your mind is CONTROLLED by caucasoids his-STORY or his-LIE! Pick your choice.
I'll try to be brief as possible! Afrikans DID NOT SELL THEIR OWN PEOPLE! They were TRICKED AND DECEIVED by the european slave makers. However, they did practice INDENTURED SERVITUDE, which was like INCARCERATION. When an Afrikan king or other Afrikans commited a crime against another kingdom, he was punished. This punishment was similar to a jail, but the indentured servants had rights and privileges just like the other Afrikans, who 'incarcerated' them. By the way...the jail system we have today COPIED from these Afrikans.
After serving their TIME, they were released and the king returned to his position of power and authority over his kingdom! This is where the LIE comes in...the europeans TRICKED and DECEIVED the kings, who had power over the indentured servants. They told them, as you stated, they would TRADE molasses, trinkets and food, if they could BORROW their servants for a certain amount of time. When these servants were released to these lying europeans, THEY KEPT THEM FOR LIFE and NEVER returned them to the kings, who released them.
This was CHATTEL SLAVERY, the most dehumanizing form of slavery and servitude! Although, the kings THOUGHT the europeans were HONEST AND TRUTHFUL; they found out they had lied to them; therefore, the europeans began taking over their land, resources and servants...and the rest is HIS-story! This is how the LIE, that came to be written in the white boy's his-STORY books began, about AFrikans selling their people! THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS...THEY WERE DECEIVED, just like c_____ are doing today, with THEIR political system...deceiving Black people to believe we are FREE, when we are still enslaved, mentally, financially, spiritually and economically. Same game different program.
THERE YOU HAVE IT... amerikkka and england, the front runners for ENSLAVING AFRIKAN PEOPLE AND AMERINDIANS [who were Black Indians] already in amerikkka. The europeans SPREAD ALL THESE DIS-EASES, such as smallpox, 'black' plague and other dis-eases they contacted from each other, WHEN THEY ENSLAVED THEIR OWN KIND. They brought those dis-eases to Afrika and this how dis-eases began to spread in Afrika. Just like the AIDS epidemic, which was spreaded in Afrika by europeans! NOTHING HAS CHANGED SINCE OUR FORCED ENSLAVEMENT.
Europeans were the people, who SOLD AND ENSLAVED THEIR OWN PEOPLE. They sold the UNDESIRABLES to amerikkka. Slavery FIRST began in england during the 1400's. A group of white slaves from england were sold to amerikkka, which were labeled PILGRIMS. But, these pilgrims were MURDERERS, THIEVES AND RAPIST, who amerikkka brought from england, and that's when they came to Virginia and SCALPED, RAPED AND SODOMIZED THE BLACK AMERINDAINS [Black Indians].
And the LIE OF thanksgiving was introduced to amerikkka! But the true identity of this so-called HELLADAY was called THANKSTAKING. Because these white enslavers TOOK the land from the Black Amerindians, who are errorneously called Indians!
THE REST IS...you already know!
HAVE A GOOD NIGHT AND F____ amerikkka!!!
YOU WAKE UP
I'll try to be brief as possible! Afrikans DID NOT SELL THEIR OWN PEOPLE! They were TRICKED AND DECEIVED by the european slave makers. However, they did practice INDENTURED SERVITUDE, which was like INCARCERATION. When an Afrikan king or other Afrikans commited a crime against another kingdom, he was punished. This punishment was similar to a jail, but the indentured servants had rights and privileges just like the other Afrikans, who 'incarcerated' them. By the way...the jail system we have today COPIED from these Afrikans.
After serving their TIME, they were released and the king returned to his position of power and authority over his kingdom! This is where the LIE comes in...the europeans TRICKED and DECEIVED the kings, who had power over the indentured servants. They told them, as you stated, they would TRADE molasses, trinkets and food, if they could BORROW their servants for a certain amount of time. When these servants were released to these lying europeans, THEY KEPT THEM FOR LIFE and NEVER returned them to the kings, who released them.
This was CHATTEL SLAVERY, the most dehumanizing form of slavery and servitude! Although, the kings THOUGHT the europeans were HONEST AND TRUTHFUL; they found out they had lied to them; therefore, the europeans began taking over their land, resources and servants...and the rest is HIS-story! This is how the LIE, that came to be written in the white boy's his-STORY books began, about AFrikans selling their people! THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS...THEY WERE DECEIVED, just like c_____ are doing today, with THEIR political system...deceiving Black people to believe we are FREE, when we are still enslaved, mentally, financially, spiritually and economically. Same game different program.
THERE YOU HAVE IT... amerikkka and england, the front runners for ENSLAVING AFRIKAN PEOPLE AND AMERINDIANS [who were Black Indians] already in amerikkka. The europeans SPREAD ALL THESE DIS-EASES, such as smallpox, 'black' plague and other dis-eases they contacted from each other, WHEN THEY ENSLAVED THEIR OWN KIND. They brought those dis-eases to Afrika and this how dis-eases began to spread in Afrika. Just like the AIDS epidemic, which was spreaded in Afrika by europeans! NOTHING HAS CHANGED SINCE OUR FORCED ENSLAVEMENT.
Europeans were the people, who SOLD AND ENSLAVED THEIR OWN PEOPLE. They sold the UNDESIRABLES to amerikkka. Slavery FIRST began in england during the 1400's. A group of white slaves from england were sold to amerikkka, which were labeled PILGRIMS. But, these pilgrims were MURDERERS, THIEVES AND RAPIST, who amerikkka brought from england, and that's when they came to Virginia and SCALPED, RAPED AND SODOMIZED THE BLACK AMERINDAINS [Black Indians].
And the LIE OF thanksgiving was introduced to amerikkka! But the true identity of this so-called HELLADAY was called THANKSTAKING. Because these white enslavers TOOK the land from the Black Amerindians, who are errorneously called Indians!
THE REST IS...you already know!
HAVE A GOOD NIGHT AND F____ amerikkka!!!
YOU WAKE UP
________________
sharon
13 hours agoNO THE SHERIFF IS NOT DOING WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO DO. THE SHERIFF IS IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW . HE IS TARGETING ALL MEXICANS , EVEN THE ONES THAT ARE HERE LEGALLY, BESIDES IF YOU WANT TO DEPORT PEOPLE WHO ARE HERE ILLEGALLY THEN THEY SHOULD SEARCH ALL RACES OF PEOPLE WHO COMMITS CRIME ........ NOT JUST A SELECTED GROUP OF PEOPLE . ONCE THE IDIOT SHERIFF GETS THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN HIS JAIL, HE GIVES THEM PAPERS OF THEIR CRIMES IN ENGLISH , KNOWING THAT THEY CAN'T UNDERSTAND OR WRITE ENGLISH.
Esquire_manCA11 hours ago
16 hours ago
11 hours ago16 hours agoDrugs are one of the main traps used to capture Black men. While at the same time elite boarding schools, and universities are awash in drugs, and no one ever suffers any penalty