__________
_____________________
_________________
__________
Paul H.
3 months agoand once they go "out"
they should stay out
but of course, as soon as they get into trouble with that 'greener grass'
they'll come running home
they should stay out
but of course, as soon as they get into trouble with that 'greener grass'
they'll come running home
_____________
________________
truthseeker26 minutes ago
________________
truthseeker
26 minutes agoThis is her business who she sleeps with. It does not give you the right to defame her and call her out of her name. I am not a fan of Ri-Ri because I feel that her, along with nicki manaj, lady gaga & beyonce knowles are the new personification of Sodem & Gommorah. they are a bad influence on the young girls of all races and I do not respect them. with that being said, the racist, white woman needs to keep her racist thoughts to herself. nobody wants to hear it. for the record, once and for all: the term n_____r is a derogatory word put on the Black race by the white race to demean us. It is not acceptable and it is offensive. don't get it twisted because you hear confused Black people use the term forgetting its history of pain and death. you know it is wrong and it is not to be used with any excuse.
______________________________
Note by Me: I don't agree with all of Rihanna's action, but she doesn't deserved to be demonized like that period.
By Timothy
________________
What this black guy doesn't understand is that civil rights was never narrow issue except for the narrowminded. There are fundamental moral issues involved. And if we have reason to question Ron Paul on civil rights or other social justice issues I previously mentioned, then there's good reason to pause before joining the Ron Paul agenda. I don't think you can "move on", only move forward or perhaps move backward. While both parties do seemed worn out, the problem is that in the corporate state none others are allowed except on the periphery. Libertarians like Ron Paul either belong to the Republican Party or are consigned to a political wilderness. Progressives are largely in the Democratic Party or are also marginalized. The intersting thing about the Occupy Movement is simply that it declares allegiance to no party, though some Democrats want to coop it. The Tea party, however, is mainly a part of the the Republican Party. Unless the confinement of American political life is broken, democracy is doomed in America
-Savant
_____________
I happen to teach a class in, for lack of a better word, philosophical anthropolgy. And we do a lot of exploring of what it means to be human. That has been discussed and debated for thousands of years. But I don't think such a philosophical discussion is possible here, nor necessary for right now for the sake of the issue to be discussed. For everyone can at least identify actual members of the human race even though the meaning of being human or human nature is arguable. As for Tea Partiers, I think they're human beings and entitled to rights as human beings. But I also think they're backward looking, reactionary people who don't understand the complexities of contemporary society. I think that the human being's relation to nature has to be greatly changed if the world is to be livable, and if human beings are to live in full dignity as well; for human beings are a part of nature, however peculiar a part we are. Also, I do not equate earth and property, as property is a human institution. Earth, water, air are elements of nature which some people have claimed as property. And yes, I think every human being is superior to property. Human beings possess intrinsic worth in my book. Property has no personal being. Property exists for humans, not vice versa.
-Savant
_____________________
Thats real....as more and more of our people open up that third eye, they'll realize what they're dealing with....unfortunately, we'll have some that never open it up, and will sell their soul to this devil.....Black Love Is The One Thing That Will End This Devil....literally and figuratively....brothers and sisters have to realize that....
MA'AT
@MegaMalik30 It's so much deeper than that. The system never really want Blacks to survive in the first place. The powers that be hate, hate, hate strong Black couples and families. To tell Black women to get with white men is pouring salt on a deep wound that is still there for five centuries. Like the other sista said that White men haven't changed his views on Black women. His sexual entitlement complex is still there and that he will always go back to the White women for sure.
________________________
6 hours ago_________
Michael Casey
15 hours ago________________
19 hours agoShangri La
5 hours ago They use people like this to damage our children and some of our dead-headed adults. They make the money and ruin our minds in the process. I'm sure neither of them care either way.
7 hours ago
___________
Note by Me: I don't believe that Ron Paul is a Klan member, but I get the point. Strict libertarianism is impossible to totally follow in the 21st century period.
By Timothy
jayevans20
19 hours agoSo the bad economy is Obama fault? Who was president when the country had a Trillion Dollar surplus and destroyed the economy with his conservative moves and unpaid for wars? I laugh every time I see a republican try to blame every thing on Obama. Stop watching False news!
2 days agosmittyboy72 days ago
2 days ago
2 days agoYou got that right!
As for slavery, actually EVERYONE has something to do with slavery thought only a minority owned slaves.
Everybody had something to do with it beccuase it deeply shaped and left its imprint on American society, cultura and character.
In fact, slavery is the ORIGIN of American racism in America. And poor whites were seduced into supporting racism partly out of fear, partly out of a desire to salvage their own damaged sense of esteem.(After all, whites were looked down on with contempt by their social "betters")
For the wealthy ruling classes, yesterday and today, promoting racism among whites, and dividing whites and blacks against each other, had the advantage or preventing the underprivileged, the have nots of all colors and creeds, from uniting against a common exploiter and oppressor.
This is what a lot of people do not understand.
-Savant
My argument is simply that white women are NOT more racist than white men. Or vice versa. If a person is racist his or her gender will not make him or her more or less racist.I just can't believe some of the stuff I read on the net these days. I just don't understand how I a 28 year old female who had nothing to do with slavery nor did my ancesters considering we didn't live here then (swedish). But yet I am raciest and " a Devil" according to you. I love or dislike people based on how they have treated me. My mother abandened me and my sister when I was three and was raised by a lot of different folks. I am the least bit raciest. Skin is nothing. Underneth our skin our flesh is the same. We should be equal not one more superiour then another. Belive it or not my feeling truely get hurt when I think that a group gives scholarship to black to help educate them because they are poorer then whites. That is crap poor is poor. I had the hardest time ever pulling myself out of poverty and I am still there. I couldn't go to school because I couldn't afford the payment. A lot of my friends told me hey you can get grants from these places but I got turned down (could under stand that since they made more then me). I grew up for a while in a place where I was the only white person on the bus. I was the minority in my hood. So please just lay off. Not all white women are like that. And another thing every one has a right to be proud or ashamed of there heritage. I am not white. last I checked my skin is peach and my ansesters are swedish. But I am not called a Swedish Amercian? why is that? Anywho just don't understand why rasism is still in this country. My husbands ansesters fought against slavery!
As for slavery, actually EVERYONE has something to do with slavery thought only a minority owned slaves.
Everybody had something to do with it beccuase it deeply shaped and left its imprint on American society, cultura and character.
In fact, slavery is the ORIGIN of American racism in America. And poor whites were seduced into supporting racism partly out of fear, partly out of a desire to salvage their own damaged sense of esteem.(After all, whites were looked down on with contempt by their social "betters")
For the wealthy ruling classes, yesterday and today, promoting racism among whites, and dividing whites and blacks against each other, had the advantage or preventing the underprivileged, the have nots of all colors and creeds, from uniting against a common exploiter and oppressor.
This is what a lot of people do not understand.
-Savant
_________
2 days agoRon Paul wouldn't be good for any community of any ethnicity that cares anything about public education, unemployment benefits, Medicaid, Medicare or Social Security -- all of which he wants to abolish in the name of making the rich richer.
And yeah, those racist newsletters went out for years with his name at the top of every one. If he really didn't know what people were writing in his own newsletter, is he even qualified to be president? Would anybody here allow someone to publish a newsletter with their name on the top and not know what kind of things they were writing in it?
This is another example of the Ron Paul crowd trying to deceive voters. He is in no way, shape or form progressive. Yeah, he'd end the wars, including the war on drugs. But he'd also end every program we've set up over the past 70 years to help the poor and the middle class.
____________
This is my view. Even if I'm not attracted to the man, I admire the fact that he had confidence. There is a difference between confidence and being obsessive. If a woman doesn't respond to your calls or gives you excuses why she cant see you, that's hint she may not be attracted to you. This doesn't mean she is a bad person, the attraction just isn't there. I've seen and experienced instances where the man attempts to attack your character because you're not interested. I've seen instances where men attempt to weigh you down or pop up every month. No one can force others to be attracted to them, they have to feel it.
-VirgoSLC
________
Moorspeaks wrote:
AGAIN....YOU WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS....
NO SWEETIE....THEY AREN'T....MOST WM ARE IN FACT RACIST TO THE CORE....ARE YOU CONFUSING BEING POLITE WITH BEING NICE?...THEY AREN'T THE SAME THING....NOT AT ALL....AND AGAIN....WM ALWAYS WANT TO CONVINCE ALL WOMEN THAT THEY ARE BETTER THAN THE MEN OF THEIR OWN RACE AND ARE GOD'S GIFT TO WOMANKIND....
IF THEY ARE SO DAMN NICE....THAN WHY IS IT THAT MY WIFE AND I NOW KNOW SO MANY WW WHO HAVE LEFT WM IN BITTER DIVORCES....*WOMEN DON'T JUST UP AND LEAVE THE MEN OF THEIR DREAMS ONE DAY....IT SIMPLY DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
YES THEY MAY BE NICE TO YOU....BECAUSE YOU ARE A BW....TRUST ME...THEY AREN'T SO NICE WITH BM....ESPECIALLY EDUCATED AND SUCCESSFUL BM....AND I WON'T EVEN GO INTO BM WITH ANY DEGREE OF FINACIAL ACUMEN AND FREEDOM....
AS BW MARRIED TO ONE WM....YOU'RE MAKING AN INACCURRATE GENERALIZATION....THEY'RE NICE TO WOMEN AND THOSE WHO FEED THEIR EGOS AND CATER TO THEIR SENSE OF WHITE MALE SUPERIORITY....
AND TRUST ME....HAVING AN OPEN VAGINA IS A GREAT START FOR A BW LIKE YOURSELF!....*THEY AREN'T SO NICE TO BW LIKE MY WIFE....WHO DOES NOT HATE ANYONE....BUT WHO IS ANTI IR NOR TO BM....BUT YOU WOULDN'T KNOW ABOUT THAT....AND NO THAT'S NOT BEING NICE....I'M SORRY...(HELL THEY SHOW THAT RIGHT HERE ON TOPIX!)
SORRY TO BE SOO BLUNT....BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS....YOU SEEM TO BE CONFUSED!
NOW JUST FYI: I GREW UP IN A SUBURB OF MICHIGAN....WHERE I ATTENDED ELEMENTARY....AND THEN WITH WHITE A MAJORITY OF WHITE MALES IN PARTICULAR... AT ALL MALE PREPARATORY SCHOOLS ON THE EAST COAST ....AFTERWARDS I ATTENDED TWO DIFFERENT IVY LEAGUE UNIVERSITIES....I HAVE LIVED WITH,STUDIED,PARTIED,FOUGHT AND DEBATED WITH,TEAMED UP WITH AND COMPETED WITH WM OVER THE COURSE OF MY EDUCATIONAL CAREER AND LIKE MOST AMERICANS I NOW WORK WITH A MAJORITY OF WM....AND HAVE MY ENTIRE CAREER....
DO YOU HONESTLY THINK THAT I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WHITE MALES ARE LIKE....LOL....ARE YOU SERIOUS?
*QUESTION: DO YOU THINK THAT NONBW WHO DATE BM AND WHO...."TREAT BM BETTER THAN BW" GET OUR ATTENTION BY BEING RUDE,NASTY,ARROGANT AND OBNOXIOUS....DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU?
And yeah, those racist newsletters went out for years with his name at the top of every one. If he really didn't know what people were writing in his own newsletter, is he even qualified to be president? Would anybody here allow someone to publish a newsletter with their name on the top and not know what kind of things they were writing in it?
This is another example of the Ron Paul crowd trying to deceive voters. He is in no way, shape or form progressive. Yeah, he'd end the wars, including the war on drugs. But he'd also end every program we've set up over the past 70 years to help the poor and the middle class.
____________
This is my view. Even if I'm not attracted to the man, I admire the fact that he had confidence. There is a difference between confidence and being obsessive. If a woman doesn't respond to your calls or gives you excuses why she cant see you, that's hint she may not be attracted to you. This doesn't mean she is a bad person, the attraction just isn't there. I've seen and experienced instances where the man attempts to attack your character because you're not interested. I've seen instances where men attempt to weigh you down or pop up every month. No one can force others to be attracted to them, they have to feel it.
-VirgoSLC
________
Moorspeaks wrote:
AGAIN....YOU WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS....
NO SWEETIE....THEY AREN'T....MOST WM ARE IN FACT RACIST TO THE CORE....ARE YOU CONFUSING BEING POLITE WITH BEING NICE?...THEY AREN'T THE SAME THING....NOT AT ALL....AND AGAIN....WM ALWAYS WANT TO CONVINCE ALL WOMEN THAT THEY ARE BETTER THAN THE MEN OF THEIR OWN RACE AND ARE GOD'S GIFT TO WOMANKIND....
IF THEY ARE SO DAMN NICE....THAN WHY IS IT THAT MY WIFE AND I NOW KNOW SO MANY WW WHO HAVE LEFT WM IN BITTER DIVORCES....*WOMEN DON'T JUST UP AND LEAVE THE MEN OF THEIR DREAMS ONE DAY....IT SIMPLY DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
YES THEY MAY BE NICE TO YOU....BECAUSE YOU ARE A BW....TRUST ME...THEY AREN'T SO NICE WITH BM....ESPECIALLY EDUCATED AND SUCCESSFUL BM....AND I WON'T EVEN GO INTO BM WITH ANY DEGREE OF FINACIAL ACUMEN AND FREEDOM....
AS BW MARRIED TO ONE WM....YOU'RE MAKING AN INACCURRATE GENERALIZATION....THEY'RE NICE TO WOMEN AND THOSE WHO FEED THEIR EGOS AND CATER TO THEIR SENSE OF WHITE MALE SUPERIORITY....
AND TRUST ME....HAVING AN OPEN VAGINA IS A GREAT START FOR A BW LIKE YOURSELF!....*THEY AREN'T SO NICE TO BW LIKE MY WIFE....WHO DOES NOT HATE ANYONE....BUT WHO IS ANTI IR NOR TO BM....BUT YOU WOULDN'T KNOW ABOUT THAT....AND NO THAT'S NOT BEING NICE....I'M SORRY...(HELL THEY SHOW THAT RIGHT HERE ON TOPIX!)
SORRY TO BE SOO BLUNT....BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS....YOU SEEM TO BE CONFUSED!
NOW JUST FYI: I GREW UP IN A SUBURB OF MICHIGAN....WHERE I ATTENDED ELEMENTARY....AND THEN WITH WHITE A MAJORITY OF WHITE MALES IN PARTICULAR... AT ALL MALE PREPARATORY SCHOOLS ON THE EAST COAST ....AFTERWARDS I ATTENDED TWO DIFFERENT IVY LEAGUE UNIVERSITIES....I HAVE LIVED WITH,STUDIED,PARTIED,FOUGHT AND DEBATED WITH,TEAMED UP WITH AND COMPETED WITH WM OVER THE COURSE OF MY EDUCATIONAL CAREER AND LIKE MOST AMERICANS I NOW WORK WITH A MAJORITY OF WM....AND HAVE MY ENTIRE CAREER....
DO YOU HONESTLY THINK THAT I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WHITE MALES ARE LIKE....LOL....ARE YOU SERIOUS?
*QUESTION: DO YOU THINK THAT NONBW WHO DATE BM AND WHO...."TREAT BM BETTER THAN BW" GET OUR ATTENTION BY BEING RUDE,NASTY,ARROGANT AND OBNOXIOUS....DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU?
____________
The very fact that Ron Paul opposed CIVL RIGHTS in favor of PROPERTY RIGHTS, is itself a BIG PROBLEM. And it fits an old conservative tradition of favoring property over people. The defense of slavery and of child labor was also largely in the name of property rights. So there's a LOT wrong with that. First and foremost are HUMAN RIGHTS; people before property. Though coming from a different political and philosophical perspective, Ron Paul might support SOME things progressives would support and oppose some things that progressives would oppose. But that would be coincidental for the most part. Our opposition to militarism, support for the Civil Rights act, the decriminalization of drugs, social security, universal health care are based on values greatly different than Paul's. We have a different conception of freedom and social justice than he does. And if he were elected (and had enough support in Congress)he probably would NOT succeed (even if he tried) to cut the military budget, but he would slash funds for education, health care, social security and the like. I doubt that he would directly attack Civil Rights. But as he thinks the Civil Rights act should be applied to government, but not the private sector, any new attacks on the civil rights of people of color would get very weak opposiiton from him unless someone wanted to hand a "For Whites Only" sign to a government building. As for the original intent of the Founding Fathers, as they were mainly wealthy white men (many slaveholders) I'm under no illusion that they desired democracy or socialism for America. Indeed, even the Federalist Papers indicate that they largely had a limited vision of freedom restricted by property rights and class privilege. Tom Paine perhaps excepted (
-Savant
_________
Shangri La
1 hour agoI believe it. These women usually want the black men because of their looks, the myths about their sexuality, the truth about many (not all) black men desiring white women over black women, the truth that many (not all) black men seek out white women to go w/ their fame and/or fortune and they want that money. Look at all the black male millionaires and when they pass away or divorce, half or all of that money goes to their white wife and her family and never sees the black community. That's why they prop all of those white women around the athletes. That's why educating professional athletes, or black people in general will never be on their agenda. Why educate your cash cow so that they will be too smart to fill your milk pail for free? This is why our ancestors and anyone who helped them were killed if they learned to read. Hence, we have been conditioned so that too many of our children today think they are not supposed to be smart. It's all connected. The game is so clear, but too many of us still can't get it.
Until our men begin to respect, love and protect black women, this world has no chance. We are the mothers of this world. Those who control this place know this, this is why they send out all those messages to the world that white women are better and have incorporated too many (not all) black man into their efforts to tear down the character, reputation and spirit of black women.
Stop falling for the pretty (as you see it) poison, my brothers.
Until our men begin to respect, love and protect black women, this world has no chance. We are the mothers of this world. Those who control this place know this, this is why they send out all those messages to the world that white women are better and have incorporated too many (not all) black man into their efforts to tear down the character, reputation and spirit of black women.
Stop falling for the pretty (as you see it) poison, my brothers.
___________
1 hour agoJenQueen, I think she was a crazy, gold-digging RACIST. This is not the first time that I have heard of incidents in which there was a black person married to someone of a different race and that non-black spouse/partner make racial slurs in a nasty argument.
This is one reason why black folks need to be very cautious about who they marry; you can't just assume that because a non-black person marries YOU, he or she is embracing your race.
This is one reason why black folks need to be very cautious about who they marry; you can't just assume that because a non-black person marries YOU, he or she is embracing your race.
__________
57 minutes ago______________
Stop chirping,Frank. Check out Ron Paul's position of the Civil Rights law of 1964. We ought to look very carefully at that and a few other things before voting for Ron Paul.*crickets chirping*
He has some ok ideas, but also some very bad ones.
-Savant
First of all, individualism and racism are not mutally exclusive. Sometimes they are mutally reinforcing. Check out a book called BLACK IMAGE IN THE WHITE MIND by George Frederickson for an analysis ehich shows how individualism (beginning in the Jacksonian era) actually help give added force to racism.Ron Paul is the complete opposite of a racist. He speaks of individualism, a strong opposition to racism. He does not discriminate. Ron Paul supports freedom, and as he has said before, "Freedom unites it all, it does not divide us."
Now I don't know if Ron Paul is a racist in the sense of viewing Blacks (or non-whites generally) as inferior to whites, but his opposiion to civil rights legislation amounts to DE FACTO support for Jim Crow, even though he claims to be personally opposed to it.
-Savant
15 hours ago___________
CobaltBlu
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment