Josephine Baker | PDF | Violence (scribd.com)
TruthSeeker24's anti-N.W.O. corner: Thanksgiving 2021: Part 2 (truthseeker2473.blogspot.com)
World War II: 70 Years Later Part 2 | PDF | Normandy Landings | World War II (scribd.com)
Mpilo Mizere
· June 15, 2017
Science? This is not science but the usual tactic of stealing African history.
Now let's look at the real facts.
This is not the first DNA study of Ancient Egyptian mummies. DNA tests were done on the Amarna mummies 5 years ago but the results weren't often talked about why? Because they clustered closely with modern day Bantus. As a historian you should know that! http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2012-01-01.pdf http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2013-02-01.pdf Why do you act like these results don't exsist?
The latest DNA results are from the third intermediate and late period of Egypt. This is a time when Egypt was ruled by Persians, Assyrians, Romans, Greeks and Nubians YES NUBIANS.
The DNA results are MTDNA which is only passed from mother to daughter.
The claim that “Subsaharan DNA” only came after the Romans is complete nonsense. The Nubians ruled Egypt 700 years before the Romans! And the Egyptians intermarried with Nubians throughout its history.
These mummies are from ONE SITE.
So let's look at your science now. We take MTDNA from mummies from the third intermediate period from one site and now claim that this represents the entire 5000 year old history of Egypt and these results now tells us the DNA of the Old, Middle and New kingdom, ignoring the fact that we have the results for the Amarna period? And you say that's science? Sounds more like racism to me. People can't stand the thought of Africans being involved in Ancient Egypt. Period.
PS RAMSES 3 belonged to the same haplogroup as Nelson Mandela! Lol
Famous people's Y-DNA listed by haplogroup.
Look up E1b1a… even Wikipedia knows this!!
Ramesses III - Wikipedia
