Sunday, December 28, 2008

Jesuit Coadjutors


ColossusOfDestiny wrote:
Sorry if I am a little behind on termonology but what is a Temporal Coadjutor?

No problem, Colossus.

I think that the following piece is a good demonstration of the particular type & definition of Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor that I was using here. These are "Jesuits of the short robe", Jesuit-trained intelligence & espionage agents provocateurs, thus not Jesuit priests .

Their numbers include top politicians, military men, intelligence ops, financiers & even conspiracy forum diversion agents:

Possible Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors at Freedom4um

00-Hotherp Reports 13 Aug 2007 Coral Snake

Before we start I must explain the term Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor. A Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor is not someone who wears a black robe with his collar on ass backwards as you might expect, in fact they are not even necessarily "he" at all. This is because a Temporal Coadjutor is not a Jesuit but someone in the order's employ, particularly when working for pet "New World Order" projects. Most of them were educated from Jesuit run Roman Catholic schools and universities and have received their brainwash regarding pet "New World Order" projects they are supposed to participate in in those schools.

One of the main projects of the Jesuit Order and thus the NEW WORLD ORDER, which is nothing more than the OLD ROMAN EMPIRE disguising itself as an organized religion using the NEW WORLD ORDER to regain its "temporal authority" over the world is Anti-Semitism or more accurately Anti-Judaism. However we will continue to use the term Anti-Semitism in this article because that is what Anti-Judaism is best known as.

Anti-Semitism serves many important purposes for the Jesuit Order in reestablishing the Pope's emperor ship or world "Temporal Authority" through the New World Order. Probably the most important is to tar anti New World Order truth groups with the brush of the Nazism and Anti-Semitism that the Jesuit Order actually created. This is the one we will be concerning ourselves with here. (Hitler was brought up with a Jesuit/Roman education and it is now believed a Jesuit priest rather than Rudolph Hess was the ghost writer for Hitler in the writing of Mein Kamph. In addition to this Hitler admitted having the deadly SS force organized along the lines of the Jesuit Order showing that he and Heinrich Himmler knew the organization of that order intimately.) Other New World Order purposes for Anti-Semitism are:

1. Undermining the authority of the King James Bible all of which is translated from documents written by JEWS under the inspiration of God.

2. Depopulation: The Holocaust or Showah as it is known to Jews was part of a more general depopulation scheme by the NAZIs that included even so called "aryan" Germans that did not match up to Hitler's and the "New World Order's" standards for the best "citizen" slaves of that so called "master race". (And yes the Holocaust or Showah was a historical fact no matter how much the Anti-Semites try to deny it.

3. Undermining the ONLY gun rights group that gives the TRUTHFUL history of so called "gun control" laws and their DIRECT tie to GENOCIDE and DEPOPULATION movements, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

Now on to the story of possible Jesuit Coadjutors amongst the Anti-Semites at Freedom4um. It begins with two other web sites Liberty Forum and Basically in its beginnings Liberty Forum is a forum site formerly run by a Libertarian screen named John Deere (probably after the tractor company by the same name) for debating assorted Libertarian issues and is a hard core Anti-Semite site that accuses Jews of involvement in every crime since the late 19th century as well as practicing Holocaust/Showah denial and pro Hitler "nostalgia". has also been tied in with the Jesuits as a Temporal Coadjutor site. These two sites came into voilent fusion when Hard Core Anti-Semites who were AND ARE in all probability Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors began posting articles to Liberty Forum turning it into a "lite" and destroying its original purpose of being a debate forum on Libertarian subjects. This eventually caused John Deere to simply pick up and leave the site to the Anti-Semites. Eventually Libertarians regained control of Liberty Forum and began to push the Anti-Semites off their forum, first by outright banning but later by use of a "Bozo" like system based on voting or against articles in such a way that unpopular articles would not be seen unless an individual wanted to see them and set the software to show them. (This latter system like the Bozo filter is used by the general populace of the forum and is therefore seen as a more Libertarian way to deal with the Anti-Semite problem than outright banning by an admin or moderator.)

The so called "censorship" against the Anti-Semitic Jesuit Coadjutors at Liberty Forum caused them to look for another place to spread their venom and undermine genuine patriots and Constitutionalists trying to get the truth out on the New World Order by tarring ALL of them with the Anti-Semite brush.

At about the same time as all of this was going on another Constitutionalist/patriot/libertarian forum called Freedom Underground was being split in two with one half of its membership staying at the Freedom Underground site and the other half forming a new site called Freedom4um. No sooner did Freedom4um start up than its Anti-Semitic contingent started inviting the hardcore Anti-Semites that were being "censored" (actually Bozoed by having their articles voted against by the Libertarian majority there) at Liberty Forum over to the New Freedom4um. This event pretty much brings us up to the present.

Now to get back to the issue at hand, why do I consider at least some of the Anti-Semites at Freedom4um to be Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors. The first reason for this is when I first began to expose the "New World Order" as nothing more than a scheme by THE POPE and the JESUIT ORDER to restore the Pope's Imperial/Temporal Authority over the world and a new ROMAN EMPIRE on Freedom4um the ANTI-SEMITES there began a ridicule campaign to try to shut this exposure down with several of them ACTUALLY ADMITTING to having been educated in JESUIT SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES.

All I can say is that it is a good thing that Freedom4um is a relatively small site relative to FreeRepublic, LibertyPost and Liberty Forum. Even though these three forums continue to have their own serious corruption problems Anti-Semitic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors undermining and condemning as Anti-Semites serious efforts to expose the New World Order and ITS REAL SOURCE, the wannabe NEW ROMAN EMPIRE currently disguised as an organized religion are not amongst them. I believe that this IS a current and DEADLY problem at Freedom4um and one that other patriot and truth sites should be very careful of even if it means abandoning a little libertarianism in speech, for this Jesuit founded project of Anti-Semitism could by public demonization alone destroy the patriot/constitutionalist/truth movement very easily if it gains control of ALL of its forums and Chat rooms the way it did with Freedom4um. Not to mention the fact that Anti-Semitism itself is probably of genuine demonic origin in all likely hood because of its ability to undermine the Authority of the Jewish originated documents that were translated into the King James Bible.

Note that the people running & financially driving Israel are not of the Jewish religion, they are Kabbalists (e.g. those Royal knights & Papal Court Jews, the Rothschilds & Shimon Peres), & that since the time of Christ the Talmudics have controlled religious Judaism (the Papal-loyal Rabbis & Rebbes, who have no king but the Papal Caesar). Karaite Judaism is the only form of non-Talmudic (as were the true, original followers of Moses through to the Babylonian Exile, though recurringly plagued by Occultists in their midst, especially from Solomon's time on) religious Judaism, but even this is Antichristian & hatefully so from some of the quarters that I have read.

The ordinary, non-fundamentalist Jews, not leaning toward either extreme Orthodoxy or extreme & mostly covert Occultism bear the hatred of those agitated into anti-Jewish fury by Rome. The true spiritual Jews today - though now freed from the Law - are Christians, not the Babylonian Talmudic Orthodox "Jews" or Kabbalistic Occultists: both flipsides of the same coin & working in tandem for Rome against both non-Talmudic, non-Occultist Jews & Protestant Christians.

I realize that this is slightly off-topic as per your question, but necessary context to add to the above piece I feel.

Provable Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors, Jesuit-trained assets (Hayden, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Giuliani) & other Papists (such as the Bushes) executed 9/11, to blame ultimately on the "Jews".

I have posted lists of these men & their Jesuit, Papal & general Romanist connections.

There are those who strongly deny any of this.

There are those who say that they agree, but then act & write in a way that can only benefit the Great Red Dragon of Rome.

The question that we must ask ourselves in both of these cases is why?



Troy's Info

Someone didn't like Eric's beliefs & info, so they started a topic to look for ways to besmirch him, as one maintaining the position that the Jesuits reign over the whole Illuminati (High-level, Deep Occult Freemasonic) network - including those within the Knighthood Orders & the Labor Zionist Kabbalists (such as the Rothschilds) working to bring about the New World Order.

Thus this information is completely relevant & on-topic, demonstrating just how correct Eric has been along in his thesis.

There is the position of the "Antizio-Nits" that "the Jews" are all-powerful. This is completely unfounded, as demonstrated by my presentation above, showing that the Rothschilds have been Royal & Papal Knights all along, loyal to their Sovereign Queen & to their Papal Grand Master & thus in deference to their Jesuit Overlords.

Just like Jesuit-educated Vatican asset Shimon Peres, recently made a Knight of the Order of Sts Michael & George, & thus loyal to his Grand Master the Duke of Kent (also Grand Master of the UGLE & thus global head of Regular Freemasonry - whose own son, a converted Roman Catholic, was married in the Vatican in 2006 with Papal blessings) & Sovereign Queen Elizabeth II, that Papal Dame of the Order of Malta.

You would prefer someone to talk drivel to in an attempt to divert from these incontrovertible truths.


Saturday, November 29, 2008

A View on the Middle East








We need to also consider the complicity of countries like Syria and Egypt who refused to accept the new refugees, instead pushing them back into the land of Israel and helping boil-over the conflict between the Arabs and Jews.

This if I'm not mistaken was around the time of the fall of the Ottoman Empire. Once I refresh my memory I'll post back all the historical details.

Edit: Here it is.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Since AntiSionist rejects the bible saying “You can't make up shit more wacky than the Bible stories” & “The Bible is pure BS” obviously biblical explanations will not be materially convincing in a explanation.

All I can say is that when the occupants of the land of Israel were basically forced to 'up and leave,' totally abandoning their lands and physical property they became justly enraged. Some of the historical accounts I remember reading a few years back were terrible tales of families and old people being forcibly removed from their land and property. Then the surrounding nations would not (at least during that time period) accept them into their borders.

The people who are perpetrating this crime are certainly not Christians, they are papists. The goal of displacing the Palestinians is not the purpose of their agenda, it's only a means to a end. For you see Satan eyes in Jealousy the eternal place of Jesus (Ezek. 8:3,6; Isa. 14:13-14), the holy mountain.

“Who shall ascend into the hill of the LORD? or who shall stand in his holy place?” - Psalms 24:3

The Jewish nation today is a 'remnant among nations'; they are scattered. If this is true how can the Jews be responsible for the actions in Israel? Sure, the masonic Jews are aiding and abetting the papists and Jesuits who wish to establish a 'Papal throne' in Jerusalem, but they are a minority. It's the 'synagogue of satan' working in accord with the Pope who are responsible for the actions against the Palestinian people.

This is the truth so do with it what you will. I would simply leave the area and try to find a new home instead of fighting against the will of God.

“And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.” - Matthew 24:6

It's probably highly frustrating to be dealing with the designs of the Jesuit order and the 'supreme primate' in your area. History has shown that the illegitimate Israeli government continues to harass the peoples living the gaza strip and non-Jewish surrounding areas. In my opinion it is insanity to stay here. There is no reason to fight against the pope because historically he usually wins (aided by his goon squad and pope's toolbox). You would probably be much happier in another country where there isn't constant fighting and conspiracies afoot to destroy your neighborhoods.

Islam seems to both be a friend and enemy of the pope. If he cannot control you he will destroy you. The current occupation of the temple mount cannot last in the Pope's eyes. To him the wailing wall is a fantastic success.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Both sides are being played as fools. There is news evidence of both Israel and Palestine being more-or-less reciprocally belligerent in the matter over the years. Unfortunately the true explanation requires a belief in the bible as the undeniable reality of existence. If you don't believe in the bible then all that will come of any discussion is 'they stole our land they must die; you are wrong and I am right.'

Eric has already given ample biblical explanation, but if you reject the bible I guess you see our explanations as spurious?

I mean AntiSionist if you're really a muslim pick up a copy of the Oxford history of Islam and see how it started out as a cult that worshiped a meteorite fragment which they put into their own kind of ostensorium called the kaaba. In fact the cultists tried to murder muhammed and he had to flee to Medina for cultic 'sacrilege.' Sure the two practices merged (meteorite worship and muhammed's 'revelations'), but before that time they were opposed; and the cultic activity predates the life of muhammed by tens of years.


user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image


When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

And it came to pass, when Joram saw Jehu, that he said, Is it peace, Jehu? And he answered, What peace, so long as the whoredoms of thy mother Jezebel and her witchcrafts are so many?



Friday, November 28, 2008

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Abraham Lincoln

This is the link.

IBM, Nazi, Carlyle Group, The Pandemic Holocaust

From This is the link.

*****The Bush Administration's Secret Biowarfare Agenda*****************************************

Global Researchby Stephen LendmanJuly 28, 2008


When it comes to observing US and international laws, treaties and norms, the Bush administration is a serial offender Since 2001, it's:-- spurned efforts for nuclear disarmament to advance its weapons program and retain current stockpiles;-- renounced the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and asserted the right to develop and test new weapons;-- abandoned the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) because it expressly forbids the development, testing and deployment of missile defenses like its Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and other programs;-- refuses to adopt a proposed Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT) that would prohibit further weapons-grade uranium and plutonium production and prevent new nuclear weapons to be added to present stockpiles - already dangerously too high;

Read The Rest HERE Martial Law and the Avian Flu Pandemic - Global Research, October 4, 2005 - The threat of the avian flu pandemic is real. Until recently, national governments and the WHO have dismissed the seriousness of the crisis. The public has been misinformed. The issue has been barely mentioned by the media. Why all of a sudden is avian flu on the presidential agenda?



It has been over 50 years since Adolf Hitler took his life in a small underground bunker near Berlin. And while, for many, the Holocaust that he planned and executed against the Jewish population of Europe is a thing of the past - a dark chapter of our history that serves a reminder of man's inhuman potential - for others, it is a subject of unrelinquished sorrow and tireless investigation. It is in the latter camp that we find Edwin Black, author of the Pulitzer Prize-nominated international bestseller IBM and the Holocaust. The book, which documents IBM's direct links to Hilter and his so-called 'Final Solution' by providing the Third Reich with census machines and punch card technology, caused IBM to issue a formal statement claiming that the Nazis controlled the operations of IBM Germany during the war. But Edwin's research shows that Thomas J. Watson, founder and president of IBM during the company's financial relationship with the Nazis, exercised more hands-on control of the operation than they care to admit. In his GuerrillaNews directorial debut, Paul Shore interviews the author and deploys GNN's trademark design aesthetic in what is sure to be one of the most controversial documentaries about U.S. corporate complicity with the Nazi regime.
IBM and the Holocaust was cut to the pulsing hypnotica of Mitchell Akiyama

IBM’s Hollerith Machine - To help systematize the persecution and extermination of 'undesireables'

IBM Custom Punch Card for Nazi SS Race Office

Nazi prisoner tattoos coordinating with the IBM punch card

IBM works closely with the American Nazis in the CARLYLE GROUP


The 9/11 - 7/7 Connection video
Zbigniew Brzezinsky former advisor under JFK, LBJ, Jimmy Carter and co- chairman of the NSATF under Herbert Walker Bush's administration."The Trilateral Commission was founded by the persistent maneuvering of David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Rockefeller, [then] chairman of the ultra powerful Chase Manhattan Bank, a director of many major multinational corporations and 'endowment funds' has long been a central figure in the mysterious Council on Foreign Relations. Brzezinski, a brilliant prognosticator of one-world idealism, has been a professor at Columbia University and the author of several books that have served as 'policy guidelines' for the CFR. Brzezinski served as the (Trilateral) commission's executive director from its inception in 1973 until late 1976 when he was appointed by President Carter as assistant to the president for national security affairs." -Anthony C. Sutton and Patrick M Wood, Trilateral Over Washington - Some notable members of the Trilateral Commission include George Bush, Dick and Lynne Cheney, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, David Gergen, Richard Holbrooke, Madeleine Albright, Robert McNamara, Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan and Paul Wolfowitz. US Senators Diane Feinstein, Robert Taft Jr., Charles Robb, William Cohen, and John Glenn, Congressmen, Ambassadors, Secretaries of Treasury, State and many other political figures are Trilateralists. There are also many banking institutions represented at Trilateral meetings including the European Central Bank, World Bank, IMF, the Federal Reserve, Chase-Morgan, Citibank, Bank of America, Bank One, Bank of Tokyo, Bank of Japan and more.
Also plenty of multi-national corporate interests are represented including Fuji Xerox, Goldman Sachs, AIG, Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Chevron, Texaco, Sony, Samsung, Comcast, Time Warner, Carlyle Group, Levi-Strauss, Daikin, Sara Lee, GE, GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Johnson and Johnson, IBM, Boeing, and Citigroup

Carlyle Group Subsidiary Named "MATRICS" is Brimming with NSA and CIA Operatives and pushing a Swastika-Shaped Tracker Chip


Monday, November 10, 2008

More on Smerconish and Human Life


Can anyone tell me when Michael Smerconish has ever uttered anything remotely conservative? He is a tool that the MSM calls upon when they want the opinion of a conservative. This POS is no loss, since he wasn't even a conservative to begin with.
40 posted on Friday, October 17, 2008 5:39:04 PM by appleharvey
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 1 View Replies]


To: pissant
I was in junior high with my wife. I moved after the 9th grade, but my wife stayed in the same town. Anyway, Smerconish was a year ahead of us and although it was quite a while ago now, I remember him as being the class jerk. Same with high school according to my wife. Central Bucks East High School, Holicong, PA!!! :-)
43 posted on Friday, October 17, 2008 5:51:19 PM by SoCalConservative
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 1 View Replies]



To: TorahTrueJew
Oh I see what you're saying. I guess he is rather hypocritical in that sense. Besides, he shouldn't assume abortion will ever "help" a rape victim. Abortion just re-victimizes her by violating her body in another horrible way.


To: TorahTrueJew
When did Rush Limbaugh ever mention Terri? I stopped listening to him because he never mentioned her. He was too involved with his own case. I may be wrong, but I had gotten the definite impression that Rush didn't want to antagonize the ACLU, which has taken his part, AND defends Michael Schiavo.
Rush seemed very surprised that the ACLU would side with him, because he's a conservative, and has continually criticized them, after all. But I knew that the real issue is this so-called "right to privacy." That's what Limbaugh's case and Terri's have in common.
The anti-Christian ACLU would defend Jesus Christ before Pontius Pilate, if the case had anything to do with the "right to privacy."
48 posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 11:59:43 PM by Lauren BaRecall (Blue state address, red state soul.)
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 1 View Replies]


To: Williams
Moderates are as bad as liberals IMHO. Calling oneself a moderate means that you think that when two people argue, neither side is ever completely correct and that the truth must always lie in the middle. This is the Ten Commandments and divine law to a Moderate. Nobody is ever entirely correct or entirely wrong, the truth is in the middle. You know how democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding on what to have for dinner? To understand moderates, imagine to people arguing. One argues that we should walk into a room of 100 innocent people and kill everybody. The other says that killing is wrong, and we should let them all live. The moderate says we should kill 50 people, so satisfy both wishes. Let's just say that G-d is not a moderate... There is truth and there is falsehood, and nothing in between.
60 posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 6:43:37 AM by TorahTrueJew
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 54 View Replies]


9 posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:23:46 PM by floridavoter2
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 6 View Replies]



Fight FOCA

*Over 70,000 people have already signed this- let's keep it going!!!!!**

OBAMA: "The first thing I’d do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That’s the first thing I’d do.

For those that missed just why pro-lifers so much fear Barack Obama, it is the above quote! With one fail swoop of his pen, Obama will have successfully eliminated what the pro-life movement has worked so hard for since Roe V Wade! Some of you may believe in a women's so-called "right to choose," but surely you have to believe in some limitations when it comes to the practice of abortion.
To learn more about the Freedom of Choice Act, read on and then sign the petition!

The aim of the Freedom of Choice Act is to eradicate common sense state and federal laws that the majority of Americans support, as well as will prevent states from enacting similar protective measures in the future.
This includes:

-ELIMINATING bans on Partial Birth Abortion, a procedure that involves delivering a baby feet first, stabbing him/her in the back of the neck and suctioning out the babies brains all while the baby is alive and kicking.

-ELIMINATING requirements that women be given information about the risks of getting an abortion. I'm absolutely baffled as to why a clinic that performs medical procedures would be treated any different than any other medical facility! I couldn't even get my wisdom teeth pulled without watching a video on the risks involved, as well as without signing multiple papers stating that I understood the risks. For example, for those that also live in Allen County, our clinic wasn't even regulated until July 2007. One saw more regulations in a tattoo parlor- 23 pages worth to be exact, but not a single one in our abortion clinic. Why shouldn't a medical facility that administers anesthesia, dispenses drugs and performs medical procedures that involve many risks such as sepsis, uterine and bowel perforation, death, damage to internal organs, etc. on top of the many potential emotional consequences including depression, increased risks of alcohol and drug abuse, increased risk of suicide, etc.
, be treated like a medical facility???

-ELIMINATING the requirement that only licensed physicians can perform abortions, which again is baffling!! I don't know about you, but I would never in a million years want a non-physican performing any type of medical procedure anywhere near me, ESPECIALLY in that specific area of my body! More importantly, let us not forget why abortion was legalized in the first place, to supposedly protect women from dangerous back-alley abortions, yet here we are having to fight to keep in place requirements that real doctors perform abortions in clean and safe facilities! Ironic, I think so!

-ELIMINATING the requirement that parents must be informed and give consent to their minor daughter's abortion. WHAT??!! Can you imagine the school nurse saying to your child: "No you cannot have an aspirin for your headache, but if it's an abortion you need, give me a second to grab my coat and keys!" Or worse, imagine someone close to you has sexually assaulted your 12 year old which leads to a pregnancy.
He then hides his crime by taking her to the local clinic for an abortion and you never had to know about it which will inevitably continue his abuse of your child!

-ETC, ETC, ETC......

So again, maybe you support a woman's right to an abortion, but surely you want women to be given all relevant information about the procedure as well as be protected from shoddy doctors (or non-doctors for that matter) and unclean facilities. And surely you don't want anyone else to be able to make medical decisions for your child. And surely you don't agree with a baby enduring the horrendous practice of being partially delivered and then killed. And surely......




Monday, September 29, 2008

Open Letter to Philadelphia Radio Talk Show Host Michael Smerconish about Terry Schiavo


Open Letter to Philadelphia Radio Talk Show Host Michael Smerconish about Terry Schiavo
Me 2/24/2005 Me

Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:00:26 PM by TorahTrueJew

As an introduction, there is a local "conservative" talk show host in Philadelphia named Michael Smerconish. He calls himself conservative, but is even more liberal than Sean Hannity. He is always talking about things that bug him, and how the government ought to make laws against these common annoyances. Today, he actually said that Terry Schiavo's husband loved her and had her best interests in mind, and that he would want to die too if he were PVS like her. I was shocked, so I wrote this letter to him. It is important that we get ALL media talking the truth, especially talk radio, since if talk radio isn't supporting her, nobody will. I sent this letter to him tonight, and thought you'd all like to see it.

Dear Michael, My wife and I listen to 1210 everyday, from Smerconish to Dom, we listen to everybody. We always joke with each other about your liberal comments, oftentimes when you think some new law should be passed against something that annoys you. I have to admit to you, we jokingly call you, "Michael Jerk-onish" when you say something really pro-big government, or just throw softball questions at really liberal guests.

Today, however, your show ceased to be amusing. We always cringe when you have on that Bio-Ethicist Arthur Kaplan. Every person I ever met or heard speak called a "bio-ethicist" was anything but ethical, and Kaplan is no exception. The things I hear him say are terrifying. When you told him that you saw video of Terry Schiavo interacting, he calmy explained that it was all "reflexes", and that she was for sure unconscious. He sounded like the doctors who tell you that the movement of a baby at 9 months gestation inside the mother's womb is all reflex, and that the baby isn't really aware of what is going on. You accepted his explanation and decided that her husband must be correct in trying to kill her.

I cannot believe you could even engage in a conversation like this, much less agree with him. Terry Schiavo is a living, breathing human being. Who cares if her eyes followed the balloon because she liked it or because her "eye muscles reflexively followed the color and light"? It is an academic question that can be debated among teams of doctors trying to find ways to make her better (something no doctor has been allowed to try since he won his lawsuit). The only thing she needs to keep her alive is food. Many doctors say she can even eat by mouth, but her husband won't allow it. Babies and small children must be fed. The elderly must be fed. Many people who are in accidents and are handicapped must be fed. Relying on others to feed you is NOT life support. Last year, Oreilly interviewed a woman who was diagnosed by all the doctors as PVS. She had been operated on with no anesthesia, and was in the process of being starved to death when she finally regained the ability to talk. She has since told her story. She was aware of everything going on around her, and described the excrutiating pain of not only hearing her starvation discussed, but what it felt like to starve to death. It is a horrifying way to die. Can you imagine the outcry if we decided to execute the prisoners at Abu Ghirab by starving them to death? What if we tortured them by starving them for 3 days? Why no outcry at starving this poor woman to death?

If you are intellectually honest, and you really think that she is PVS and deserves to die, then I challenge you. Tomorrow morning, at 7:30am (when I am listening), announce that you support blowing off Terry Schiavo's head with a shotgun. If you are condemning her to death, then at least, on the doubt that she may still feel pain, let the death be painless. If you refuse to support blowing off her head with a shotgun, then why do you support starving her to death? Mass murderers are entitled to execution without pain, so why not Terry Schiavo?

Please do not politicize the issue of Terry Schiavo. It is not a right/left, prolife/prochoice, liberal/conservative issue. There is a mountain of evidence that her husband does not have her best wishes in mind. There are written statements by nurses who attended to her indicating abuse. Her husband could be afraid that should she recover, she'll tell the police about what he's done and he'll be criminally liable. The only doctors allowed to examine her closely have been pro-euthanasia doctors, hand-picked by a lawyer who has made a career (and a book) out of right-to-die cases. Her parents have offered Michael all the remaining money from the lawsuit, all the money from her estate, and complete freedom from further litigation. All they want is their daughter. Her husband is now essentially a bigamist, living a common law marriage with another woman, and it is inconceivable that he really has his wife's best interests in mind.

I was also shocked when you said that you felt that if the courts of Florida ruled in favor of her husband, that he must be correct. This logic supports both Slavery and Abortion, both of which were upheld by our country's judiciary. I suggest you read Mark Levin's "Men In Black" if you do not understand how judicial tyranny threatens our freedoms. In the case of Terry Schiavo, it threatens her life.

Terry has suffered for years being called a vegetable by the main stream media. Thanks to the internet, the blogosphere, and MOST talk radio (Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity), the message is getting out and political pressure is being brought to bear on Jeb Bush. You can do a great service to Terry by examining the case, and even if you don't have enough evidence to convince you she is alive, at least err on the side of LIFE! If she really is PVS, then she won't care that she is still alive and her family will be happy. If she isn't PVS, then you will have saved an innocent woman from death.

Sincerely, Me Suburbs of Philadelphia, PA


To: floridavoter2
Actually, he has taken up for Terry Schiavo, which I appreciate. My wife and I had been getting so annoyed by him as of late, but Michael Smerconish shows us it could be a lot worse. I could go on and on about Sean Hannity. One example--he goes on an on about how sacred a life is, and how abortion at any point is wrong. Then he says that it is okay in the case of rape or incest. How can he argue that abortion is murder unequivocably, but then say that the murder is okay if it is preceded by rape or incest?


To: TorahTrueJew
Oh I see what you're saying. I guess he is rather hypocritical in that sense. Besides, he shouldn't assume abortion will ever "help" a rape victim. Abortion just re-victimizes her by violating her body in another horrible way.


To: Tribune7
Oh yeah--forgot about that. He loves Arlen Specter. I can't stand him and am embarassed that I voted for him. But Smerconish just adores him. Goes well with Arthur Kaplan who is pro-abortion.


To: TorahTrueJew
Do you remember when Smerconish went to Cuba and sucked up to Castro. He asked him some asinine question about Frank Rizzo, as if the decrepit old creep had any idea who he was. Lost all my respect for Smerconish.


To: TorahTrueJew
We must use all of our might to right this injustice. When it involves radio talk show hosts, we need to light the fire under those who have become lazy and would allow neglect and expediency become the status quo rather than engage in the hard work needed to protect the sick and infirmed. We must oppose government when it fails to protect us from those who would threaten our life when we are in our most vulnerable condition.This is a battle for the future which will determine the ethical treatment of human beings as determined by the extent forces succeed in the erosion of the value of human life. This battle will be lost if we allow public opinion from such moral degenerates as Michael Smerconish to dominate the cultural discourse. When those such as him advocate for what used to pass for murder, they are opening the door for such moral decay that the taking of a life for some imagined justification may become commonplace and legal. What I fear are relatives pressuring poor souls to a early death for expediency sake; especially when such pressures are being aggravated by increased health care costs that have been affected by temporary economic forces.When the Baby Boom Generation makes its way through the dying years, the moral decisions that are made will determine the dignity we will place on human life in the future. The Terri Schiavo case is a litmus test to see if the forces of moral ethics can stand up to the legal challenges of the culture of death. We are beginning to wake up to the fact that the culture of death is becoming entrenched. The alarm bells are sounding. We will need to be weeded out of the culture through expensive court action and support of right to life candidates if people are to be safe in their hospital beds from the barbaric bargaining of human life on the auction block of expediency.
Finally, one most important action that everyone can do daily: We can pray to our Creator that all people will be given the dignity that life made in God's image deserves.


Michael is the guy who has bragged about his friendship with Arlen Spector ad nauseum and had him as a guest on his program many times. Spector took a group of people to Cuba. Michael was one of them. When Michael returned, he bragged about having smoked a cigar with Fidel Castro, oblivious to the sensibilities of conservatives in his listening audience which is a mistake (either doing it or bragging about it) no TRUE conservative would ever make.
There are a host of other issues large and small, for which conservatives could take him to task.
Most recently Smerkonish supported Lynne Abraham and the ridiculous charges she filed against the protestors from REPENT AMERICA.
And now this. He sides with Michael Schiavo and the court without knowing and understanding the facts of the case.
Smerconish is another intellectual LIGHTWEIGHT who doesn't belong where he is. Michael Smerkonish is solely about promoting Michael Smerkonish and nothing more.
Your letter is excellent. Far better than anything Michael has ever written. Thank you for taking the time to write it and for defending Terri to a SMALL TIME KNOW NOTHING talk show host who I stopped listening to long ago.
45 posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:31:17 PM by TAdams8591 (The call you make may be the one that saves Terri's life!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 1 View Replies]


I don't think that Sean is a conservative. He supported Schwartzenegger over McClintock, the true conservative.He sounds very supportive of Rudy Giuliani for any office (especially against Hillary), even though Rudy is not only pro abortion, he's also pro partial birth abortion.
I stopped listening to Sean, too.
49 posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 12:09:45 AM by Lauren BaRecall (Blue state address, red state soul.)
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 47 View Replies]


I wonder if he thinks the court was right in dropping charges against the Philly Christians.
I don't know, since I never heard him discuss the charges being dropped. Smerconish certainly did side with the "Pink Angels", the District Attorney, and the Philly Police regarding the arrest and prosecution of the Christians. He was very, very hostile to Christians and their lawyer when they were on his radio program. When they tried to tell their side of the story, he accused them of "spinning the truth."
Smerconish also took calls from homosexuals on the program, who tried to paint the Philadelphia 5 Christians with hate groups and terrorists. Smerconish let them talk all they wanted.
Then Smerconish wrote an article in the Philadelphia Daily News attacking the Christian group--saying basically that they got what they deserved.

When callers where upset and outraged with Smerconish's approach to this issue, he got very testy on the air, and claimed "Listen pal, I worship the same God that you do!"
Lately, there have been a number of editorials on the net critical of Smerconish's behavior. He also admitted he is good friends with the DA, prosecutors, and Judge in the Philadelphia 5 case who wanted the Christians punished for appearing at the "Outfest!" demonstration.
53 posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 4:50:59 AM by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply Private Reply To 52 View Replies]

Monday, September 15, 2008


A brief summary of presidential directives, executive orders, and congressionaly approved bills that where signed into law over the last 40ish years.

And no, this isn't a bunch of conspiracy nonsense. They are simply facts.

It spent $1.3 billion building secret bunkers throughout the United States in anticipation of government disruption by foreign or domestic upheaval. Yet fewer than 20 members of Congress , only members with top security clearance, know of the $1.3 billion expenditure by FEMA for non-natural disaster situations. These few Congressional leaders state that FEMA has a "black curtain" around its operations. FEMA has worked on National Security programs since 1979, and its predecessor, the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency, has secretly spent millions of dollars before being merged into FEMA by President Carter in 1979.

Operation Cable Splicer, Garden Plot, and REX 84 (short for Readiness Exercise 1984) are programs long on the shelf, awaiting the appropriate "disaster" to be taken down and implemented. Garden Plot is a program designed to control the population, while Cable Splicer is a program engineered for an orderly takeover of state and local governments by the federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and will head up operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation, and include the following:
10990 (allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports), 10995 (allows the government to seize and control the communication media), 10997 (allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals), 10998 (allows the government to take over all food resources and farms), 11000 (allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision), 11001 (allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions), 11002 (designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons), 11003 (allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft), 11004 (allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations) and 11005 (allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities).
More recently, the National Defense Authorization Act, under Sect. 1042, allows the use of "the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies" and explicitly gives the executive the power to invoke martial law -- in other words, kiss Posse Comitatus good-bye. For the first time in more than a century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order," Lewis Seiler and Dan Hamburg wrote for the San Francisco Chronicle in February. Add to this the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and National Security Presidential Directive 51, allowing for "continuity of government" in the event of what NSPD-5 vaguely calls a "catastrophic emergency," and the framework is in place for the imposition of martial law.

As a recent example of the sort of activity FEMA is engaged in, as they tell flood victims in the Midwest to fend for themselves, consider the $22 million per year the agency has spent "on a terror training program within a real town in New Mexico where helicopters buzz overhead in the middle of the night, mock nuclear explosions are drilled and 'suicide bombers' are taken down by SWAT teams who pull citizens out of their homes," writes Steve Watson. The Associated Press (see video) deems such events "unthinkable," and indeed they are, while floods and hurricanes are a reality.
FEMA has very little to do with the sort of natural disasters the people of Iowa, Wisconsin, and Indiana are currently experiencing and everything to do with martial law, thus DHS boss Chertoff's satisfaction "with the federal response to the massive Midwest flooding" is little more than a dog and pony show, a public relations gimmick slapped over the real face of FEMA.

Sunday, August 24, 2008



“Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer
well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical
nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected
representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.”
- Club of Rome

The First Global Revolution

The environmental movement has been described as the largest and most influential social phenomenon in modern history. From relative obscurity just a few decades ago it has spawned thousands of organisations and claims millions of committed activists. Reading the newspaper today it is hard to imagine a time when global warming, resource depletion, environmental catastrophes and 'saving the planet' were barely mentioned. They now rank among the top priorities on the social, political and economic global agenda.

Environmental awareness is considered to be the mark of any good, honest, decent citizen. Multi-national companies compete fiercely to promote their environmental credentials and 'out-green' each other. The threat of impending ecological disasters is uniting the world through a plethora of international treaties and conventions. But where did this phenomenon come from, how did it rise to such prominence, and more importantly, where is it going?

While researching for these articles, and during my academic studies, I have come across many references to the The Club of Rome (CoR), and reports produced by them. Initially I assumed that they were just another high-level environmental think-tank and dismissed the conspiracy theories found on many websites claiming that the CoR is a group of global elitists attempting to impose some kind of one world government.

However, as I have struggled to untangle the convoluted web that is the Global Green Agenda, I have been amazed that the same names keep appearing as the authors of binding international agreements, as the organisers of key summits and conferences, and as the most vocal proponents of new systems of governance. A core group of very influential leaders appear to be working in unison to implement a far-reaching global agenda.

When I searched for links between these men, who keep appearing in nearly every area of global environmental politics, I discovered that they were all members of the Club of Rome. Now extraordinary claims, like a global conspiracy, demand extraordinary proof. But this conspiracy is hidden in plain sight. They make very little attempt to hide their real agenda. On this website I try to use quotes and excerpts as much as possible and let the reader reach their own conclusions.

So, what exactly is the Club of Rome and who are its members? Founded in 1968, the CoR describes itself as "a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity." It consists of current and former Heads of State, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe.

The Club of Rome subsequently founded two sibling organizations, the Club of Budapest and the Club of Madrid. The former is focused on social and cultural aspects of their agenda, while the latter concentrates on the political aspects. All three of these 'Clubs' share many common members and hold joint meetings and conferences. As explained in other articles on this website it is abundantly clear that these are three heads of the same beast. The CoR has also established a network of 33 National Associations.

Some Current Members of the Club of Rome triad:

Al Gore – former VP of the USA, leading climate change campaigner, Nobel Peace Prize winner, Academy Award winner, Emmy winner, lead the US delegations to the Rio Earth Summit and Kyoto Climate Change conference, largest shareholder in the Chicago Climate Exchange.

Javier Solana – Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, High Representative for EU Foreign Policy.

Maurice Strong – former Head of the UN Environment Programme, Chief Policy Advisor to Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit, co-author (with Gorbachev) of the Earth Charter, co-author of the Kyoto Protocol, founder of the Earth Council, devout Baha’i.

Mikhail Gorbachev – CoR executive member, former President of the Soviet Union, founder of Green Cross International and the Gorbachev Foundation, Nobel Peace Prize winner, co-founder (with Hidalgo) of the Club of Madrid, co-author (with Strong) of the Earth Charter.

Diego Hidalgo – CoR executive member, co-founder (with Gorbachev) of the Club of Madrid, founder and President of the European Council on Foreign Relations.

Ervin Laszlo – founding member of the CoR, founder and President of the Club of Budapest, founder and Chairman of the World Wisdom Council.

Hassan bin Talal – President of the CoR, President of the Arab Thought Forum, founder of the World Future Council, recently named as the United Nations 'Champion of the Earth'.

Sir Crispin Tickell – former British Permanent Representative to the United Nations and Permanent Representative on the Security Council, Chairman of the ‘Gaia Society’, Chairman of the Board of the Climate Institute, leading British climate change campaigner.

Kofi Annan – former Secretary General of the United Nations. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Javier Perez de Cuellar – former Secretary General of the United Nations. .

Robert Muller – former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, founder and Chancellor of the UN University of Peace.

David Rockefeller – CoR executive member, former Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, founder of the Trilateral Commission, executive member of the World Economic Forum, donated land on which the United Nations stands.

Stephen Schneider – Stanford Professor of Biology and Global Change. Professor Schneider was among the earliest and most vocal proponents of man-made global warming and a lead author of many IPCC reports.

Bill Clinton – former President of the United States, founder of the Clinton Global Iniative.

Jimmy Carter – former President of the United States, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Bill Gates – founder of Microsoft, philanthropist

Other current influential members:
(these can be found on the COR (here, here, and here), Club of Budapest, Club of Madrid and/or CoR National Association membership pages)

Ted Turner – American media mogul, philanthropist, founder of CNN
George Soros – multibillionare, major donor to the UN
Tony Blair – former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Deepak Chopra – New Age Guru
Desmond Tutu – South African Bishop and activist, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.
Timothy Wirth – President of the United Nations Foundation
Henry Kissinger – former US Secretary of State
Barbara Marx Hubbard – President of the Foundation for Conscious Evolution
Betty Williams – Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
Marianne Williamson – New Age 'Spiritual Activist'
Robert Thurman – assistant to the Dalai Lama
Jane Goodall – Primatologist and Evolutionary Biologist
Juan Carlos I – King of Spain
Prince Philippe of Belgium
Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands
Dona Sophia – Queen of Spain
Karan Singh – Chairman of the Temple of Understanding
Daisaku Ikeda – founder of the Soka Gakkai cult
Eduard Shevardnadze – former Soviet foreign minister and President of Georgia
Richard von Weizsacker – former President of Germany
Martin Lees – CoR Secretary General, Rector of the UN University of Peace
Ernesto Zedillo – Director of The Yale Center for the Study of Globalization
Frithjof Finkbeiner – Coordinator of the Global Marshall Plan
Vaclav Havel – former President of the Czech Republic
Hans Kung – Founder of the Global Ethic Foundation
Ruud Lubbers – United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Mary Robinson – United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Jerome Binde – Director of Foresight, UNESCO
Federico Mayor – Director General of UNESCO
Tapio Kanninen – Director of Policy and Planning, United Nations
Konrad Osterwalder – Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations
Peter Johnston – Director General of European Commission
Thomas Homer-Dixon – Director of Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Toronto
Emeka Anyaoku – former Commonwealth Secretary General, current President of the WWF
Wangari Maathai – Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, founder of the Green Belt Movement
and many more….

The concept of 'environmental sustainability' was first brought to widespread public attention in 1972 by the Club of Rome in their book entitled The Limits to Growth. The official summary can be read here. The report basically concluded that the growth of the human population, and an increase in prosperity, would cause an ecological collapse within the next hundred years:

“If the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years. The most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity.”

“It is possible to alter these growth trends and to establish a condition of ecological and economic stability that is sustainable far into the future. The state of global equilibrium could be designed so that the basic material needs of each person on earth are satisfied and each person has an equal opportunity to realize his individual human potential.”

“The overwhelming growth in world population caused by the positive birth-rate loop is a recent phenomenon, a result of mankind's very successful reduction of worldwide mortality. The controlling negative feedback loop has been weakened, allowing the positive loop to operate virtually without constraint. There are only two ways to restore the resulting imbalance. Either the birth rate must be brought down to equal the new, lower death rate, or the death rate must rise again.”

“The result of stopping population growth in 1975 and industrial capital growth in 1985 with no other changes is that population and capital reach constant values at a relatively high level of food, industrial output and services per person. Eventually, however, resource shortages reduce industrial output and the temporarily stable state degenerates.”

“Man possesses, for a small moment in his history, the most powerful combination of knowledge, tools, and resources the world has ever known. He has all that is physically necessary to create a totally new form of human society - one that would be built to last for generations. The two missing ingredients are a realistic, long-term goal that can guide mankind to the equilibrium society and the Human Will to achieve that goal.”

“Without such a goal and a commitment to it, short-term concerns will generate the exponential growth that drives the world system toward the limits of the earth and ultimate collapse. With that goal and that commitment, mankind would be ready now to begin a controlled, orderly transition from growth to global equilibrium.”

So as you can see the even back in 1972 the Club considered modern industrial society to be completely unsustainable. They state that even if population was frozen at 1975 levels, and industrial activity at 1985 levels, then the earth’s ecosystems would still ultimately collapse. The CoR has not changed these views in the slightest, in fact, in the last three decades their warnings have become increasingly more urgent and alarmist. They call this imminent collapse the ‘World Problematique’ and their proposed solution the ‘World Resolutique.’

The Limits to Growth is considered to be the most successful environmental publication ever produced and propelled the Club of Rome to its current position of an environmental thought-leader and a major consultant to the United Nations. It has been translated into more than forty languages and sold more than 30 million copies. Throughout the 1970s and 80s the concept that humanity was irreparably damaging the earth gained credence and facilitated the formation of mainstream and activist environmental groups.

All meetings of the CoR are held ‘behind closed doors’ and no public records are kept. However the Club does produce many ‘discussion reports’ that can be found on its website. The United Nations contracts the Club of Rome to prepare ‘Policy Guidance Documents’ which it uses in formulating its policies and programmes. A quick search for Club of Rome on the UNESCO publications site reveals 250 documents. There are many other documents there authored by CoR members. As many high ranking UN officials are actually CoR members, this is like a man asking himself for advice, and then agreeing with that advice. Not very objective!

Twenty years after the Limits to Growth the CoR published another major report that became an instant best-seller. In The First Global Revolution the Club of Rome claimed that the time to act had run out. It was now or never. Delay in beginning corrective measures will increase the damage to the world ecological system and ultimately reduce the human population that will eventually be supportable. They also stated that that democratic governments were far too short-sighted to deal with the ‘problematique’ and new forms of governance are urgently required.

In order not too violate any copyright protection I will not reproduce the text of the book on this site. However, it is permissible for me to quote a brief excerpt in the context of this wider discussion. The complete text can be found on Google Books. As you read the following quotes please remember the names of the leaders listed above. This is not some quirky little cult. This is the stated agenda of the leaders of the environmental movement:

“This is the way we are setting the scene for mankind’s encounter with the planet. The opposition between the two ideologies that have dominated the 20th century has collapsed, forming their own vacuum and leaving nothing but crass materialism.

It is a law of Nature that any vacuum will be filled and therefore eliminated unless this is physically prevented. “Nature,” as the saying goes, “abhors a vacuum.” And people, as children of Nature, can only feel uncomfortable, even though they may not recognize that they are living in a vacuum. How then is the vacuum to be eliminated?

It would seem that humans need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.

New enemies therefore have to be identified.
New strategies imagined, new weapons devised.

The common enemy of humanity is man.

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.

The old democracies have functioned reasonably well over the last 200 years, but they appear now to be in a phase of complacent stagnation with little evidence of real leadership and innovation

Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.”

So, long before Global Warming became a well known issue Al Gore and his Club of Rome colleagues stated that they would use the threat of global warming to unite humanity and "set the scene for mankind's encounter with the planet." In the same way that shamans and sooth-sayers in medieval times used their advance knowledge of when eclipses would occur to control and terrify their followers, they would use a natural phenomenon as their 'enemy' to achieve their objectives. But then they state that although Global Warming would be presented as the initial enemy, the real enemy of humanity would be portrayed as man himself. I am already noticing how frequently the terms climate change and overpopulation are being uttered in the same breath.

Having discovered that all these influential environmental leaders were associated with the Club of Rome I set about reading all the reports, lectures and speeches on their website as well as the reports commissioned by the UN. I was amazed to find that they lay out their entire agenda for anyone who has eyes to see. Exactly the same themes, concepts and phrases are repeated continuously throughout their publications. They are full of references to 'imminent collapse', 'dying planet', 'our mother Gaia', 'wrenching transformation', 'united global society', 'global consciousness', 'new forms of governance' etc. They truly intend to bring about the world's First Global Revolution.

The Kosmos Journal provides perhaps the best insight into their worldview. This Journal was founded by the Club of Rome in partnership with with several of its sibling organizations. As described in my article, The Green Web, the CoR has established a network of supporting organizations, each focussing on a different aspect of their agenda. The Kosmos Journal contains many articles written by CoR members. The basic premise of their worldview is:

"Modern industrial civilisation is fast outstripping the Earth's natural regenerative and life-supporting capacity..."

"At current rates of resource depletion and environmental degradation a near complete collapse of ecological integrity will occur within the next 100 years..."

"Gaia, our Mother, who nutured humanity for countless millenia within her womb of evolution, is dying..."

“A small window of opportunity now exists to transform humanity into a sustainable global interdepedant society based on respect and reverence for Earth..."

"A radical change from the current trajectory is required, a complete reordering of global society..."

"Humans only truly unite when faced with a powerful external enemy..."

"At this time a new enemy must be found, one either real or invented for the purpose..."

"Democracy has failed us, a new system of global governance, based on environmental imperatives, must be implemented quickly..."

Gaia, Global Warming, and Global Governance are intricately entwined, if one truly believes in Gaia, and that she is being fatally harmed by the current system, then a new system of global governance and control would appear to be the only answer. Global Warming provides the ideal 'enemy' to bring about this objective. It is easy for these global elitists to talk about sacrifice, wrenching transformation, population control and halving the use of fossil fuels but the implications are truely horrendous.

Even if you think this is all nonsense I would ask you to at least read these quotes and excerpts, and think about the implications of their agenda. Everyday I am amazed at how quickly things are changing. It is coming hard and fast. It's almost like reading a book and then watching the television adaptation, except that this adaptation is not a movie - it's on the evening news. As Al Gore said in the closing sentence of his statement after he won the Nobel Peace Prize ... "This is just the beginning."

Sunday, August 3, 2008

No more of the apostate word-faith movement


*************EMAIL #1***********

Subject: Wonderful Site!
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:42:04 +0000 (GMT)

Dear Sister Tracy,

I recently discovered your website and had to write to tell you what a
blessing it has been. My wife and I have been trying to find a church home
here in ------. This area is heavily saturated with
Romanists (in fact I was one but saw the Light, Praise the Lord!) and many
of the more prominent churches seem to be Word-Faith based.

My wife and I have studied and spoken long together, and searched within
ourselves. We both believe in the Word of God and believe all that is
written therein. Your articles, especially those on bible versions, have
been very helpful. One church we tried used the NKJV so we bought some
inexpensive copies (this was over 5 years ago). I wondered then about that
sign on the cover but foolishly did not research it. The first bible I
bought after being saved was an NIV. I had no idea, being a new believer,
and relied on their prefatory comments stating the accuracy of their work.
Oh how deceived I was! We have recently purged all these from our home and
are reading our KJB's and sticking with it. The church we found recently
uses the KJB (we had already decided we would not stay if they did not) and
so far, so good. It is not word-faith either, but is non-denominational.
We have been listening closely to the pastor's messages and are measuring
what we are taught against God's Word.

The articles we read about the Toronto and Brownsville movements bore up
what we felt also. One pastor we had (the one who used the NKJV) took his
whole family, his co-pastor, and the music ministry to Toronto and then to
Brownsville. We left the church shortly thereafter as they attempted to do
the same things in their church.

I realized after reading many of the articles on your site why I was so
confused in my walk. The churches we had tried had us reading Kenneth
Hagin, Marilyn Hickey, and one pastor even gave us a Jesse DuPlantis video
saying "what a blessing this is." Nothing set right, I could not find
scriptures to back up what they were saying and started to think I was
missing something. I always had reservations about "slaying in the spirit"
(could not find scripture on that) and always wondered when we were told
"ok, pray in tongues now" (especially with Paul's warnings to the church
about using tongues in a service). My wife and I, after study, prayer, and
much discussion have decided to stick with the Word. If it is in there then
it is so, if not, it is of man. I thank you for the information you have
available as it has helped us to get back on our path.

God bless you and your work!

*************EMAIL #2***********

Dear Sister Tracy;

I wrote you yesterday and mentioned in my letter that my wife and I were delivered from the
word-faith movement. You indicated in your response that you would like more information on
how we got out.

Let me first explain some of the things that made us question if this church was the right
place to be:

1) The first thing we noticed is they used the NKJV and would quote often from the Amplified
and even the NIV. We asked and were given the same deceptive answer the NKJV has in its
prefatory comments about merely being "updated English". We bought inexpensive versions to use
at church but read our KJB Bibles at home. We noticed inconsistencies but let them go for a
time. How foolish when one looks back....

2) The speaking of tongues was promoted heavily and you were made to feel that "if you can't
do it, you are not truly saved" and made to feel not part of the group. Never mind that the
church leadership's use of tongues was ALWAYS the same phrases and syllables. When asked one
gets told "it is a spiritual language we were not meant to understand anyway".

3) "Slain in the spirit"... this bothered me from the get go. I had been saved in a baptist
church and had never heard anything like this or seen anything like this. My wife had seen it
before. I was curious so I went up one service to see. The pastor laid hands on me and, well,
nothing. I was told to "let go" and "be filled" and sure enough, push hard enough on someone's
forehead and they fall down. That is all that happened. But, I was now part of the group.
Oh, deception...

4) "The annointing"...this also confused me. The leader of the music ministry would actually
flap her arms like a bird to "spread the annointing around" because "it was too much to handle"
on her own. This got even worse after the church leadership went to Toronto for their share of
"the blessing". When they came back, more and more vineyard style songs crept in and once,
during one worship song she said "make love to him, make love to God". My wife and I were
shocked and embarassed at what she said. Sad but true, this woman and her husband now have
their own church spawned off the one we were in. Deception spreads.....

5) We were always told "do not question what happens" just "let the spirit move". I wondered
what spirit was moving especially near the end of our time there. When I would question where
in scripture something was I was always told "do not dampen the spirit" and "don't be a
hindrance to the service in your lack of faith".

We got away because we never stopped questioning, searched through our King James Bibles, and
listened to our hearts. We never felt comfortable at all, always felt something was amiss.
Listen to what they say and test it against scripture. Never listen when told NOT to look at
the Word of God to verify what is happening. God revealed to us ALL we need to know and we
believed it and stuck with it. Watch how they back up what they do. We were given Kenneth
Hagin literature, Marilyn Hickey literature, Jesse DuPlantis videotapes by the pastor to
explain what they were doing and why and we accepted it for a time. DON"T!!! Make them show
you in a King James Bible that what they say is true! If it is not in there then it is not to
be! That is how we got out of the lie by clinging to the very Word of God as given in the King
James Bible. We have destroyed all of our NKJV, the NIV, and all Kenneth Hagin books. All we
read now is what we should have read all along--King James Bibles with no study notes, n

Praise the Lord!!

********EMAIL #3*********

Sister Tracy,

You have permission to publish the testimony as you asked.

Oh! We found a good church!! It is an independent Baptist church, KJV
Bible only (in fact, Sunday school last week was "why we use the King
James Bible"). They are very fundamental. So far so good!

Praise the Lord!

Saturday, July 5, 2008

Bush and the Republican Gun Grabbers



Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 11:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: smandy
Subject: Fwd: [LLNews2] Bush and the Republican Gun Grabbers
To: mountainmorn@...

Note: forwarded message attached.

Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822 To: "LLNews"
From: "Larry Lawson"
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:19:02 -0500
Subject: [LLNews2] Bush and the Republican Gun Grabbers






"President Bush’s promise to extend the assault weapon ban is hardly the first time that alleged pro-gun Republicans have chosen to infringe upon 2nd Amendment freedoms.  At least Democrats are honest in their pledge to disarm the populace. 

The GOP, on the other hand, uses treachery and deception to mislead the citizenry into thinking that they will “protect” the right to keep and bear arms.  Yet, it is clearly evident that they are enemies of liberty as well."  


Bush and the Republican Gun Grabbers

by Michael Powers

‘‘To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.’’ ~ George Mason

President Bush’s pledge to extend the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons has gun owners up in arms.  The White House announcement came as a surprise to N.R.A. leaders and membership, who were stunned at the decision.  Although the original legislation is scheduled to terminate in September 2004, Senate Democrats introduced a measure to continue the ban for an additional ten years – a measure that Bush promises to sign if it reaches his desk.

Title XI of the Federal Violent Crime Control Act of 1994 banned the manufacture and import of a certain class of guns defined by Congress as "Assault Weapons." These firearms were categorized as such by certain identifying features that are military-like in appearance, but have no bearing on “efficiency,” or deadliness. The act also banned high capacity magazines that hold more than ten rounds.

A Federal ban on assault weapons was a top priority of the Clinton administration in early 1994, and it passed by a very narrow margin (216-214) in the House of Representatives.  President Clinton signed the bill on September 13, 1994 .

N.R.A. members staunchly supported Bush in the 2000 election, and they are justified in their incredulity regarding his vow to renew the ban.  But his sudden about-face should come as no surprise.  Recent anti-gun legislation confirms that Republicans are just as eager to deprive peaceful Americans of their ability to defend themselves as Democrats.   

Consider the following legislation, all of which occurred within the last six years:

·        GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N.  ( June 4, 1997 ) –

The House defeated a pro-gun amendment, by a vote of 369-54, to pull the United States out of the anti-gun United Nations.  In recent years, the U.N. has been working to establish gun control laws worldwide and is seeking ways to lead member states like the U.S. toward stricter gun control laws.

169 House Republicans voted against the amendment.


In response to the Lautenberg amendment and its harsh gun control provisions, Senate Republicans presented a less stringent version.  The amendment offered by Orrin Hatch (R–UT) and Larry Craig (R-ID) passed by a 48-47 vote.   

The Republican bill provided several restrictions on gun ownership.  It would require background checks for any private sale at a gun show. Additionally, it would assign a U.S. attorney to every district for the purpose of harassing gun owners.  

47 of 55 Republican Senators voted FOR this legislation.  



This amendment would ban private sales at gun shows unless the buyer first submits to a background registration check.  The amendment would also impose numerous restrictions on gun show promoters.  

On May 20, 1999 , this amendment passed.  Six Republicans sided with the Democrats in favoring this anti-gun legislation, resulting in a 50-50 tie vote and allowing Vice President Al Gore to cast the tie breaking vote.  



Senators Gordon Smith (R-OR) and James Jeffords (R-VT) introduced more restrictions on gun sales with this amendment.  It subjects pawnshop and repair shop transactions to the same registration and background check requirements as purchases from dealers.   

The amendment passed 79-21, with 34 of 55 Senate Republicans voting FOR the gun control legislation.

·        JUVENILE CRIME BILL (May 20, 1999) –

The Senate passed the anti-gun juvenile crime bill by a 73-25 vote.  Senate Bill 254 contained several gun control amendments in addition to the various provisions related to punishing juveniles who commit crimes.

31 of 55 Senate Republicans voted FOR the anti-gun bill.


On June 18, 1999 , the House defeated the Hyde-McCollum “Mandatory Gun Show Background Check Act” by a 280-147 vote.  This bill contained many anti-gun provisions, including trigger locks, a young adult gun ban, and lifetime gun ban for certain juveniles. 

137 House Republicans voted for the gun control package.



Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) offered a resolution that called for more aggressive enforcement of existing gun laws, tougher penalties for gun-related crimes and protection for the rights of law-abiding gun owners.  On May 17, 2000 , the non-binding vote passed 69-30.

52 of 55 Senate Republicans voted FOR more stringent enforcement of existing gun laws.

·        NO U.N. GUN CONTROL ( July 18, 2001 ) –  

Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) offered another amendment to withdraw the United States from the United Nations.  Paul argued that the country should boycott the international gun control organization, which is actively “taking guns away from civilians”.

164 House Republicans voted against the amendment.

President Bush’s promise to extend the assault weapon ban is hardly the first time that alleged pro-gun Republicans have chosen to infringe upon 2nd Amendment freedoms.  At least Democrats are honest in their pledge to disarm the populace.  The GOP, on the other hand, uses treachery and deception to mislead the citizenry into thinking that they will “protect” the right to keep and bear arms.  Yet, it is clearly evident that they are enemies of liberty as well.  

The N.R.A. donated nearly $3 million to Republican candidates during the 2000 election cycle, and gun rights groups contributed over $90,000 to President Bush’s campaign alone.  I guess $90,000 doesn’t buy much influence in Washington these days.

Timothy W. Dunn
Oregon Council on Firearm Rights
Director & Communications Coordinator
Cell 503-931-9884



"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power."


- Noah Webster of Pennsylvania An Examination of The Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, Philadelphia, 1787 

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> ATTACHMENT part 2.2 image/jpeg name=powers1.jpg