Monday, October 29, 2012

Information that's Reasonable




_______________________________



 
 


_________________________________







______________________________________







Note by Me: Whether you agree with all of his views or not, Kwame Ture always loved black people throughout the Earth. He was a real freedom fighter. I don't agree with all of his views, but his core principles are 100 percent accurate.

By Timothy (Me).


_________________________


Not all Americans are so narrowminded. But there is a streak of self-righteousness in American culture--probably part of the cultural legacy of Puritanism---which does incline many of my fellow Yanks to see themselves as a shining city on a hill..
Your interlocutor who denounces England for its shipping of a million of my African ancestors in chains to this land has perhaps forgotten that there had to be a market for them in this land.
England didn't force Americans to buy her slaves. And the atrocious treatment of slaves and their descendants after America's independence hand hardly be blamed on England.
As far as I see it, no nation has clean hands. Every nation's hands are dirty. That's especially the case with poweful nations. Hence no nation can judge another from the standpoint of its own righteousness.
All nations have Les Mains Sale. We can only redeem oursleves by committing to do justice from now on.

-Savant

____________________



Savant wrote:

Let no be doltish here. The Jews didn't have to increase any holocaust figures. Those anal retentive Nazi butchers themselves kept extraordinarly good reocrds, records which could be used againas them when they finally lost the war.
The only question is how many victims they might not have had time to record as their regime fell apart and they were overrun east and west by allied armies. By their own records, Nazi Germany murdered 6 million Jews; and only because they didn't win the war did they fail to wipe out the whole of European Jewry.
And you need to stop making up these stories about conspiracies of Jewish Bolsheviks and bankers. This is delusional stupidity which should have went out with the Third Reich.
That there were Jews among the Bolsheviks hardly proves that there was a Jewish Bolshevik conspiracy. There were far more gentiles than Jews, and Bolshevism was not "Jewish" party. It was not a Jewish movement like Zionism.
This talk of Jewish Communist conspiracies sound all too familiar even from phases of the history of my country.
How many times have we African-Americans had to hear that our freedom movement in the 1960s was a liberal, Commie Jewish plot?
Just a warning, Brother:

I've come to the tentative conclusion that Halonen is yet another deranged white Topix racist. He has an interesting twist though: He appears to be a white-Polish-supremacist who is ready to commit blood and soul to the holy mission of keeping white-Polish society free of contamination by people of color - and presumably free of the "evil Jewish menace" as well.

You may or may not wish to expend much energy on this fellow... LOL


-Harrisson

___________

Zaius has a habit of making things up, and I won't go through all the nonsense he posts here. Ask Zaius to PROVE that there are MANY Black people in the Tea Party, aside from his Black congressman.(Conservatives like to display their token accomodating Negro to legitimize their racist and reactionary policies, and to supposedly prove they're not racists)
But two things: Zaius stays that there "manyu" Blaks in the Tea Party Movement. That's FALSE. With the exception of the KKK I can hardly think of anything LESS popular in the national black community than the Tea Party.
As for his claim that conservatism has nothing to do with racism, you read ou on the "Southern strategy" of Richard Nixon and the Republicvans in the post 1960s era. Also, check out a book called CONSERVATISM AND RACISM: WHY IN AMERICA THEY ARE THE SAME.
Of course, he actually LIES about Attai to his ownf face, claiming that Attai is not really interested in America and has never visited the USA.
Strange that I met Attai in Baltimore, Md in July of last year!
He has an AA teacher who lives in Baltimore, and it seems that he has actually been to America several times-probably more often than I've been to France. That seems a strange, to mention costly habit on the part of a Frenchman who has no "concern" for the USA.
Again, Z simply makes up things and then peddles his fabriationsas facts.

-Savant

___________________________


FreeBLACKman804Moderator12 minutes agoin reply to Nehemiah53
"the only other thing it could be is his wife overruled and pull rank on his handlers and demanded that he address this issue"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, i think the President has LONGED for the chance to truly speak DIRECTLY to the situation in Chicago, but HIS STAFF and HANDLERS have probaly guided him against speaking his heart and mind. I hope that after President Obama is re elected, he will take a long look at those that give him advice and guidance. From what i have read, Mrs. Obama is not a fan of her husband's people, so perhaps she "BROKE BAD" with them and now President Obama was able to speak his mind freely.

________________


No one denies individual responsibility among black people. Not even Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X denied that. Black nationalists are just saying that reactionaries and some deluded blacks use personal responsibility as some crutch to blame blacks collectively for the system of oppression. Individual blacks are responsible for some of the crimes in community, but collectively white supremacy is responsible for the total system of oppression. That's the difference. The suffering black people didn't create slums, they didn't create the war on terror, they didn't cause mass genocides in multiple continents, they didn't formed forced population control, and they didn't create eugenics or the War on Drugs.
Who invented these things? The answer is obvious. Now, do our oppressors promote personal responsibility for themselves? The answer is No. That is why I both promote individual responsibility for my black people and I blame white supremacy for the current evil system causing havoc in the world today.

-By Timothy (Me)

_____________________

TimsomorModerator2 days agoin reply to Guest
Dude you must have gotten your history facts, that is Black History, from the history channel which to my knowledge has never shown any black history.
You should watch more Public Television, or look-up Professor H. L. Gates or Ken Burns between the two of them they have made more real history docs of the African coast and it's people then you could ever find on the history channel.
And Yes, I do mean the place that has "Big Bird" on it. Plus the "Count!"
Oh, my bad watch a movie callled "Hidden Colors" first.



____________________
X Obama Supporter wrote:

And I see you can be one very easily, it's like second nature to you isn't it? Whites don't "expect" Obama to be anyway...but we are over being tired of being called racist for not agreeing with every single thing he does and says. So over it in fact it just doesn't have little effect, but by now it has NONE AT ALL!!! It is not the world of slavery, but you still have blacks holding on to it like an excuse for all the ails them. No matter what, if you fail and your black, it's not your fault....your great great grandma was probably a slave. The little tidbit of history not passed down to you is that it was not blacks that rose up and fought for their own freedom...nope, it was whites. Those hateful, racist, rich white guys done went and started a civil war in their country and killed other white guys to free you. Even when blacks outnumbered their slave owners they didn't rise up....nope...but white guys did. Do they tell you that in those handbooks you get "keeping racism alive and how to use it for your benefit" from the liberals and all those freedom loving fighters like the good o'l Rev Al Sharpton, or Rev Wright, or Jesse Jackson? Have you ever thought for a second that if racism were to completely disappear....who would be without a job and essentially without a "cause"????? Those same people telling you and selling you on how bad it is....DUH!!! Not those racist white guys you like to blame for it!
First of all, I wasn't speaking of the attitudes of ALL whites toward Obama or toward Black people as a whole. I was talking about BENIGHTED, reactionary and bigoted white people like YOU. Moreover, I don't care if you tired of being called racist. As long as you ARE racist, I will call you on it. Especially when you think you can come into AA Forum and disrspect my people.
Futhermore, you assumption--repeated like a broken record by more benighted whites than one can count---that Blacks blame all their troubles on slavery is not only wrong, but STUPID. And only a white person who knows NOTHING but PRESUMES to know what Black people think could make such a simplistic statement.
Also, I don't need tidbits of history I studied History and Philosophy in undergraduate school at the university. And if you think that Blacks didn't rise up against slavery. I suggest you start your education by reading BEFORE THE MAYFLOWER by Lerone Bennett, BLACK JACOBINS by CLR James, and FROM REBELLION TO REVOLUTION by Eugene Genovese, and AMERICAN NEGRO SLAVE REVOLTS by Herbert Aptheker. And that's just for starters.
Also, do not stupidly assume that my opinions are established by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton--persons whom you know little about anyway. I happen to be better educated than they, as indeed I am better educated than you. I agree with them on some things and not others. Or maybe you'd like me to assume that your opinions comes from Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum and David Duke. from now on, I suggest you ASK Blacks who contact what we think instead of assuming. The era of unchallenged white privilege which allows you to tell us what we think is belong to the dark past. We have our own voices now. Our own minds too. And we see straight through you.

-Savant

____________________


Claudia JacksonModerator1 hour agoin reply to Timsomor
Some black people live in a false reality. Especially Mia Love and Herman Cain. Cain thinks that Republicans made him rich. How dumb is he? Has he ever talked with Jay-Z, Diddy, Ti, Russell Simmons or Tyler Perry? They both need to join us on planet earth!!!


______________


An interesting argument by one person:

Scapegoat4URLifeModerator2 hours agoin reply to truthseeker2436577
Of course registration for a party doesn't guarantee a vote for that party....but using plain 'ol common sense....don't you think a registered Republican identifies more with Republican ideals and therefore, by majority, votes Republican? I mean, isn't that just an obvious fact at this point.
I also think it's pretty widespread, common knowledge that each party has their segments of corruption, apathy, incompetence, .etc The electoral college, along with the two-party system, are very clearly flawed. My criticism seems to lie with Newone's denial of what appears to be historical fact, with no leg to stand on except "Dr. King wouldn't have voted for Mitt Romney." It's just silly logic.


My Response:

That's an interesting argument. Yet, as time when on in Dr. King's life, he became more progressive. His views now are not in line with the 2012 Republican platform today. That's just reality. If he was alive today, the Republican establishment would critcize his views on labor, war, unions, reparations, economic policies, etc. Many registered Republicans would theoritically identify with Republican ideals mostly, but the leaders of the Republicans have become so extreme presenty that some moderate Republicans are jumping ship. We both agree that both parties have a history of corruption and transparent imperfections. That's a given. Yet, on some issues, it seems that the GOP is going too far in hatred of almost any federal government program and some of their leaders' statements (not statements made by "Bob" or "Billy Joe" in a bar) constitute bigotry, stereotyping of the poor, and scapegoating of nearly half of all Americans. Newsone is fine with me. They are accurate to say that Dr. King's views are antitetical to the ideologies of the current Republican establishment. Newsone is mostly liberal. It is what it is. I am independent politcally. Newsone have the right to their political views (we have right to agree to disagree on some issues). I believe that the Raging Elephants' logic is faulty, because they believe that since Dr. King was once registered as a Republican that he would agree with their conservative stances unequivocally (which he didn't). The truth is that the GOP is different than it was decades ago. Yet,
are you really telling me that Dr. King would vote for Mitt Romney. Keep it real with me. LOL.


-By Timothy (Me)


________________________



Scapegoat4URLifeModerator1 hour agoin reply to truthseeker2436577
Can't argue with most of that...maybe several things. First off, let me keep it real in saying I'm a conservative so...that's gonna weigh in here.
Dr. King's era was an era permeated by a social and fiscal conservatism that is now considered reserved for Republicans. The time for unions and civil rights legislation was right and justified then. Now we have the fall out of too much help...an apathy of education, a sense of entitlement, an inability to live within our means, a rampant enforcement of double standards, and instead of a promotion of true equality our society thought it better to simply hold others down to raise certain groups. The modern Republicans have "knee-jerked" in reaction to what we've become. They recognize it, and instead of taking a moderate approach to righting it...they overreact just as bad as their counterparts.
So this issue is more complex if you really want to dissect it. While it may be true that Dr. King wouldn't have voted for Mitt Romney for the hard right position some modern day Republicans take, I can say for certain that the 60's era King WOULD NOT like the extreme leftist mentality that his movement grew into. Now had King not been killed, and instead became part of this left side extremism...well then maybe he'd support Obama.
King was a 50's style dude and Rev.....that would almost make him a con just by default. You're looking at him through the liberal eyes of a 2012 era.
But I really digressed here...my problem was with Newone's assertion that because of the GUESS that Dr. King wouldn't vote for Romney, there's no way all the documentation and historical fact of him being a Republican are true....which doesn't make sense at all.

My Response:






















I see your point, but I just disagree with you on the ideal that Dr. King would be a strong Republican today (or that Newsone intentionally wanted to promote some illogical presupposition as a means to decieve viewers). The main point of Newsone was that Dr. King may have been registered as a Republican, but he would not agree with the Republican platform today. The details may be quibbed, but the over arching theme remains.
 
Social and fiscal conservativism was strong in the era of the 1950's and the 1960's. That is accurate, but we still need union protections and civil rights protections in our time. The reason is that we have inequality problems, controversial voter ID laws, anti-civil liberty laws like the Patriot Act, and numerous attempts by some to have voter suppression (against minorities, the young, the elderly, the poor, etc.). This social reality merits the same preservation of our civil rights and labor protections that individuals fought for decades ago. This is why activists are legitimately fighting for our voting rights, labor rights, and human rights now. Although, even JFK didn't accept Reaganomics. JFK wanted tax cuts and expenditure spending in 1964. JFK wanted detente with the Soviets and possible normalization with Cuba. Even Eisenhower helped to form the international highway with goverment spending. Eisenhower would of been condemned by the Tea Party.
 
The problems you cite are cultrual complications which aren't a product of a failure of the truth of some progressive ideals. It's a product of extreme globalization, austerity policies, a glamorization of evil in Western society, discrimination, economic exploitation, and other socioeconomic problems. The enactment of certain progressive policies weren't meant to advance an abandonment of true equality. They were instituted as a basic means to prevent groups from experiencing discrimination. Certain programs aren't meant to downgrade the power of some, but it was meant to prevent the power of minorities to be further diminished in an imperfect society. Groups in various forms exist even if you disagree based on your conservative philosophical point of view. Therefore, laws protecting groups like in various ethnic groups, genders, etc. are legitimate if they are meant to grant real opportunities and to protect basic human freedoms. I do agree with you that sometimes, some Republicans go overboard in trying to rectify cultural/social issues going on in America. On the other hand, the Dr. King of the 1950's is completely different from Dr. King in 1968. By 1968, he was more radical, he was more progressive (that was his trajectory ideologically), and believed in a guaranteed annual income to help fight poverty. He wanted reparations, Dr. King praised the positive aspects of Black Power, and an end to all forms of war. He believed in supporting the revolutionary movements of the Third World. We don't know exactly what he would say about some of the unique issues that some in the left believe in. The so-called "extreme left" on some issues are better than the neo-cons. One thing is certain that Dr. King would still believe in nonviolence, peace, and he would fight against poverty internationally.


-By Timothy (Me)


___________________

Barros Serrano wrote:

Part of the conservative rant since 1981 has been that the media, scientists, EVERYONE in fact, are all “liberal liars” making things up in order to get more food stamps or something like that.
So, much of the public, if told by Rush or O'Reilly that “the sky is blue” is a liberal lie, will BELIEVE it.
Those blue-sky libtard Muslim socialist terrorists are trying to impose their blue-sky statism on us good hard-working non-blue-sky conservatives, the REAL Americans, the PATRIOTS, and it's time all the Mama Grizzlies stand up against this tyranny by Al Gore, Al Sharpton and Weird Al and their blue-sky limousine-liberal elitist effete corps of impudent snobs!!!(remember that one? By Spiro Agnew, LOL!!!)
I'm embarrassed to admit that my home state--Maryland--electe Spiros Agnew governor, which gave him a stepping stone to becoming Vice President during the Nixon administration.
Now I don't know why or how it happened since I was a child. but somehow a Maryland Democrat who was an arch segregationist ended up beooming the primary candidate opposing Agnew for the governorship. I think the bum's name was Mahoney.He was so bad that he made Agnew look progressive.
But keep in mind that the Republican Party wasn't as overwhelmingly right wing has it became later (especially during the 1980s) Maryland is a blue state, with a black population about 25%--30% of the total. In those days many Marylanders even prided themselves on their liberalism. And Agnew disguised himself as a liberal. So during the run for the governorship (probably around about 1964 or 65) Democrat Mahoney made Agnew look like a liberal.
Needless to say, Agnew got most of the Black votes, and Jewish votes.("Hey, Mahoney! This is MARYLAND, not MISSISSIPPI!" I've heard was on some bumper stickers).
Maryland lived to regret Agnew. But how in heavens name did this traditional center/left Dem state allow a freaking segregationist to become their candidate? I need to do some research to see how that happened. Weird!


-Savant


_______________________________



Did they mention on that billboard that many southern whites were previously Democrats. When President Johnson signed the Civil Rights bill, he said that he had delivered the southern white vote to the Republican party. A Civil Rights platform at the 1948 Democratic Convention almost cost President Truman the election. The southern white voters who were mainly Democrats, switched allegiance back and forth. Civil Rights was one of the main motivator for this mixed allegiance. Their was a saying that "Not all Democrats were racist but all racists were Democrats". They are mainly Republicans now.
In America, race and political affiliations are becoming synonymous. We live in an increasingly polarized society, fueled by rhetoric, and sound bites. People repeat phrases meant to elicit emotional responses, but in many instances do not know what they actually mean. Forget about knowing or understanding history!

____________

TruthisAlluring |
Mona, Shaunie and DL are all the same horse of a different color. What erks me is Evelyn did not become the poster child for Angry Latino Women. Matter of fact that is not a stereotype linked to them. They are referred to as spicy, and outspoken. White women with attitudes are said to be assertive. But an outspoken black woman is “angry”. Are some black women loud and obnoxious? Yes but so are most trailer park white women. I just get so tired of blacks always being represented as a monolithic group. How is it that one or two can be representative of an entire race. If what he said is true, why isn’t Michelle Obama on TV cussing out Fox News every night. Don’t have a seat Mr. Hughley just go to bed and stay there.

_______

mscpht Reply:

I don’t blame Mona totally, though I feel that she is just like a pimp cashing in on women with low self esteem. Alot of the women on these “Reality Shows” are damaged in one way or another. They dont know their worth as a human being, let alone a woman. Some of them feel that all they have to offer as a woman are their bodies. And as far as boycotting the shows, sadly most wont do it. They enjoy Maury, Jerry, Steve and any other show that encourages the destuction of the self worth of black women.

____________

In God we Trust |
We live in a “Nation of Rights”. Hughley is entitled to his own opinion…..with that being said…..(small caps for a reason) dl hughley is a “SELL OUT”!!!!!!
Black Women are angry because they are tired of carrying the black race on their back while many Black men have abandoned their responsibilities to the Black family unit & the Black community for a “Good Look”. Self hating & instigating negroes like dl hughley are helping to complete the agenda of conquer & divide in the Black Community.
3, 2, 1…….. Systematic genocide complete thanks to this ignorant a____ fool & those just like him.

________________________


 


________________

I think Newsone did a good job on this on. Just because a person may have registered in a party, doesn't mean that this person will vote for that party unconditionally. In 1958, Dr. King said the following: "I don't think the Republican party is a party full of the almighty God nor is the Democratic party. They both have weaknesses ... And I'm not inextricably bound to either party..." These are his words.

-By Timothy (Me)

________________

jazzwatchModerator2 days ago
AMAZING since THEY didn't LIKE him when HE was alive, SMDH......


_________________________

Dr. King questioned capitalism as early as 1949. He said the following words in 1966: "...We are dealing with class issues. Something is wrong with capitalism…Maybe
America must move towards democratic socialism.”
Enough said.


-By Timothy (Me)

______________________

SPINMASTERModerator1 day ago
Sad people..Straight up SAD!!!!!!!Republicans are very desperate right now. Although many do believe a FIX is in. It will be hard for the GOP to completely pull it off. All around the nation, reports are coming in of illegal tacitcs, dishonest publications and outright racism being used by the Republicans to try and sway this election. In Arizona, a printed statement was released in the mexican community/newspaper by repubs that the election was officially being held a day after the national election. Later when it was discovered, the GOP says it was a..MISPRINT. The big problem with todays GOP is they have decided to include all of the far right and fringe racist like the tea party and others. WHO..in their right mind would vote for a party who wants to take away from society and give to the rich? Turn social security into a 401 K and take even more away from medicare?. Why can't they fix these programs. Hell, we fix every other thing we want to. Right?You got..ta be outta your mind to vote REPUBLIKLAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

______________________



Although that giant billboard is total B.S. at least these people are man enough to put their name on their billboards and are willing to hold themselves accountable. Unlike those cowards in Ohio who are putting up those voter fraud is a crime billboards trying to threatening someone in the what these pussies called the black community. They don't have the guts to put their names on their billboards and they know damn well that there has been no proof of voter fraud what so ever. Has this been the GOP agenda the last 4 years? Intimidation, fear and hared? We all know d___ well that it didn't work back then and it's not working now. You're voting because it's your right, your choice and don't let any of these a______  tell you otherwise.

____________________

Sheri100Moderator12 hours ago
The Republican party's not even the same party that existed when Martin Luther King was alive. They don't share the same principals he shared. Things change! Abraham Lincoln was a Republican too. So What! The Dixiecrats who used to be Democrats joined the Republican party years ago. Things change! Martin Luther King would not feel comfortable with the Republican party today and they would not feel comfortable with him. In fact, he'd probably be out marching against those voter suppression tactics the Republicans put in place.


_____________________

The Sister Claudia isn't ignorant. She is telling the truth. When many of the Republicans say that blacks who are Democrats are slaves to the goverment, when they say that 47 percent of Americans lack responsibility, and when they lie and say that Dr. King would ally with Tea Party principles, then yes they are desperate. Not all Republicans are monolithic, but the GOP seems to use race baiting rhetoric all of the time (even in this forum, some pro-GOP folks mix up words via a mocking way in slang as a means to try to intimidate black people). Also, white racists regularly judge our people by their skin color not by the content of their character. Dr. King believed in affirmative actions policies via Operation Breadbasket.

-By Timothy

______________


 
TimsomorModerator18 hours agoin reply to vonveezil
Still, you must agreed that there was a ideological party change during the times you mention or will you just tow the party line of I only see Democrat and Republican without history or facts? In this change the one noticeable thing that today's GOP has kept with when they were the Southern Dems is the racial attitude.
In fact, that attitude is the only reason Romney is neck and neck in the polls today. If you believe the polls. Facts and Reality my friend, it gets y'all every time.


_____________

Halonen's comments remind me of something Frantz Fanon's Philosophy professor warned him about: "Ot was my philosophy professor, a native of Antilles, who recalled the fact to me one day: "When you hear someone abuse the Jews, pay attention, because he is talking about YOU....Later I understood that he meant, quite simply, an anti-semite is inevitably anti-Negro." (p. 122, BLACK SKINS, WHITE MASKS).
Frankly, I am suspicious of anyone who vilifies WHOLE PEOPLES.
I belong to a vilified people. I know what is at stake.

-Savant

_______________________



vonveezilModerator54 minutes agoin reply to truthseeker2436577
This is fun. I do believe like normal though, you misinterpret my way of thinking and lump it in with whatever dogma you choose to make it. When Sharpton is on everyday on MSDNC, it's all about race with him. One can play the race card too often that when there's real racism it's like the boy who cried wolf. No one believes him anymore. You said" Al Sharpton supports voting rights; he opposes police brutality, and wants
freedoms. You can disagree with him on many things, but on those issues, he isn’t
presenting racism on those topics." Really? If he supports freedom then why does he support such a man as Barack Obama, who is trying very hard to strip freedoms from every American , including blacks. Do you really think that asking someone to prove who they are when voting is suppression? Now please tell me that you and everyone doesn't use some form of ID to bank, buy liquor, cash a check or just about anything one does...you need a picture ID. But for one of the most sacred rights we Americans have , you don't need an ID. To get into an Obama campaign stop , you MUST show 2 forms of ID and have a picture ID. This assumption that voter ID is suppressive is a joke. The only reason the Democrats and Al fight it so hard is because then the illegals won't be able to vote.Which they shouldn't be able to do because they are not citizens. I oppose police brutality also, since I was beaten badly while handcuffed behind my back by 2 officers in an elevator. Rodney King didn't deserve his throttling but Denny didn't deserve his throttling either. You say he wants freedoms. What freedoms are you being deprived of? Is there one thing in this country that a black man or woman can't achieve? No, there isn't. I live in the 21st century and you telling me that I long for the days of slavery is totally wrong. No one here at all has ever been subjected to slavery. Not one of you. I have never owned a slave and never want to own a slave. I'm a proud American, and you all are Americans also. I own my own business and do work on many black peoples homes. Black peoples money is just as green as whites, Asians, or Latinos money. You fight for education but here in Chicago 48% of blacks drop out of school. 440+murders , mostly black on black. Remember this is not a Republican area , it's a total Democrat area. You say you're striving for freedoms that you already have. It's just your attitude and mindset that keeps all of you from becoming whatever you want to become. According to most polls 91% of all blacks are going to vote for Obama and the Democrats. So you telling me, that in '08 when 98% of blacks voted for Obama, that was just a mirage? Not to many blacks jumped ship it would appear. You say you don't worship the Democrats but actions speak louder than words and the overall actions of the black community derail you affirmation. Look up this movie called Runaway Slave. It's being offered on many cable networks as a ppv. $4.99. Order it and sit down with your family and friends and watch it. Or are you to far gone? Nothing keeps you from being all you can be in this country. Nothing, except your own perceptions of yourselves.

My Response to the Tea Party deciever:

This is fun. You know that the game isn't over yet. Well, it's about to be. I don’t misinterpret your words. Your words are rather transparent. You blame black people for rejecting the GOP mostly and then you try to use historical revisionism and slick tactics in trying to force guilt unto black people in trying to make them Tea Party adherents. It won't work because doubling down on trickled down will not massively stop poverty at all. Just because Al Sharpton talks about race on MSNBC, doesn’t mean it’s an example of him expressing racism. Dr. King talked about race in exposing racism. Also, Sharpton’s words’ about voter suppression, evils in the political system, and exposing corporate corruption are accurate. You cite no examples of Sharpton playing the race card in 2012 explicitly. Racism and discrimination are ever real in society and you just deny it. You cite no evidence on how Sharpton doesn’t support voting rights, real freedoms, and ending police brutality. I didn’t say that the man is perfect. Supporting Barack Obama is his right. I believe the President is right on some issues and dead wrong on others. I don’t just don’t have a hatred of the man. Folks who hate the man have immorally denied his citizenship, called him lazy, questioned his intellect, and slandered his name (and his family like the coward Glen Beck. Beck had to apologize for disrespecting the President's daughter). Some GOP people even disrespected the beautiful, intelligent Sister First Lady Michelle Obama. This isn't representative of all GOP members or all Tea Party individuals though. The anti-voter ID laws are bigger than possessing an ID, which you already know. These anti-human rights laws decrease the days in how people can achieve early voting, many people have been falsely eliminated from voting rolls, and some of these laws have been struck down by courts all across America. The Voter ID laws force people to have a government issued photo ID when other documents are sufficient in order for folks to vote. Studies prove that some of these laws will negatively effect the young and the poor. Millions of U.S. citizens don't have a government issued photo ID in the realm of 11% of all U.S. citizens.

Many pro-Republican groups put up inaccurate billboards about voting laws as well. Black people have victories in Ohio and other places too on this issue. Studies prove that voter fraud presently is very minuscule which doesn’t make it necessary for these oppressive laws to exist in the first place. Also, not one reasonable person wants non-U.S. citizen human beings to vote in American elections. Where did you get that perception from? These people who are non-U.S. citizens are still human beings and they should be afforded equal respect. Why do you cite Rodney King and Denny? No one is talking about both men here. Most black people don’t agree with what happened to both of them. Your implication that some blacks massively lack empathy of the suffering of non-blacks is telling. People are talking about Dr. King. 2 wrong don’t make a right, but the white supremacist system exists (as exposed by crammasters and other qualified black scholars). You reactionaries ignore white supremacy and racism since you want to live in your world of trying to make black people docile & submissive under your way of thinking when dealing with white people. The Patriot Act and other unjust laws deprive our freedoms. The TSA abusive acts deprive our freedoms. The evil Drug War policies and the stop and frisk situation deprive our freedoms as well. Documented voter suppression in recent times deprive our human freedoms. We have the right to promote our civil liberties period. Also, slavery is still here in the world despite it being banned overtly & legally in America. Native Americans living today didn’t experience the colonists oppressing them, but they received compensation in recent years. The legacy of racism still exists in our time and black people have the right to oppose oppression (whether it's from police brutality to discrimination). Just because you don’t own a slave doesn’t make it a justification for you to refuse to expose racism or ignore white supremacy.

Injustices still reign in society like a 6 year old sister being killed by a crooked police officer in Detroit. Also, you cite the imperfections in other cities as a means to blame blacks collectively, which is ignorance. These problems are caused by socioeconomic problems, laissez faire economic problems (these economic policies increased the debt during the Bush years. What people in Chicago need isn't your way of privatization of all resources, but a holistic approach of both public and private services in making reforms in the city. You have to spend money in investments in fighting for change, not just individual initiatives), the Drug War, etc. not by the essence of black humanity. There are those in Chicago fighting for reforms and you discount or minimize their efforts. Also, many mostly Republican areas in the Deep South have poverty, record divorces, educational problems, meth addiction, and other problems. My people don’t make up most of the pedophiles, serial killers, corporate criminals, and imperialists in America. Guess which people? Also, many black people have made great accomplishments in life. Yet, they made it by working collectively too. You never made it on your own solitary. You needed assistance sometimes collectively. The power of the individual and the power of the collective are parts of the black African cultural tradition. My attitude has nothing to do with all evils in the world. Also, most black people voted for President Barack Obama because John McCain was seen as more reactionary. McCain talked about possibly bombing Iran. Most young people voted for the President in 2008 and most people voting for Republicans are mostly white people (that doesn't mean that all white people are racist or all black people are racist for mostly voting for the President). Many black people in Maryland voted for more non-black Democratic candidates before (and in places across America). I don’t worship Democrats and to assume otherwise is deception on your part. I cite the errors of the Democratic Dixiecrats in this very forum. I am an Independent politically.

My actions of believing in truth, opposing globalization, and rejecting austerity are clear. I refuted the Runaway Slave documentary many months ago in print. Your Tea Party rhetoric (and the Tea Party is funded by the Koch Brothers and other corporate interests) is fantasy since war mongering, massive austerity cuts, scapegoating, promoting the interests of the 1 percent, and xenophobia aren’t the essence of the Dream. The Dream is about us showing respect for humanity of every background and not to scapegoat black people collectively for every social ill in America. Runaway Slave won't expose how the New Deal decreased poverty, how the poverty rate was cut massively from 1945-1975 via progressive action, or how Social Security is a very successful program. It won't expose NSM 200 and it won't expose how Dr. King wanted a guaranteed annual income for all Americans. Your denial of white supremacy and the oppression against human beings in society is telling. I have a great perception of myself and my black people. I do believe that my people can achieve great things, but I also believe in exposing white supremacy at the same time. I believe in the Dream and I believe in justice. You can't have peace without justice.


Checkmate.

By Timothy

 


________________









________________


People who still believe--in the 21st Century!--in the idea of "natural" races, genetically distinct racial types with genetically racialized differences in intelligence, are like people who still believe in spontaneous generation, like people who believe the earth is flat, or that witchcraft causes illness.
In short, they're no longer just ignorant. They're STUPID.
But the stupidity of Masud (and his house Negro Uncle Assdurratin) is very old news.

I seem to be markedly unpopular with both white and black buffoons. While I and Harrisson are mainly targeted by WHITE recists with these hate thread(like OhFrilly who started this thread), it's remarkable how many BLACK buffoons and bigots join hand with the white racists against us.
Whether it was RealBrother a couple of years ago, or Abdurratin and the mentally unstable Carol today.
Well, as I've said to Harrisson...We must be doing something right.



-Savant

___________

edud01Moderator2 hours agoin reply to billy
Not!!! The EVIDENCE don't support that. In vitro fertilizations, surrgates, test tube babies, refusal to have abortions for ANY reason, even rape and insest, and billboards begging whites to have children is evidence of your desire for white population growth, not birth restrictions. Because of your never ending fear of genetically dying out you are willing to do anything to survive and keep other group populations, especailly Black, under control.


________

filipinatriniModerator4 hours ago
In almost all of the history books I have read the white leaders have always been the most violent, from all the minor royalty in Europe, to the Nazi's, all the way to the slave owners. The are all right there with the Incas in torture and cruelty. Yes black men, and some women, are prone to violence. But white people have always seemed to enjoy the cruelty of torture of all people, including other whites. Most of the time when you hear of black violence its either someone getting beat up, shot, or stabbed. When you hear of white violence they always seem to have enjoyed taking the extra step of making their victims suffer before the let them finally die. I have read alot of history books, and I'm not talking about e-books, and you are so right when you say that blacks could never compare to whites when it comes to violence. But as I said, white violence knows no color boundaries, they will turn on each other just as fast as they will turn on someone of color. Look at how they treat one of their own once they decide to date outside of their race, any race.


____________

Barros Serrano wrote:

MANY many many many many times I find myself in here arguing against an ALLIANCE of white ultra-racists with black ultra-racists, and they, the dumb asses, never notice that they're standing shoulder to shoulder with people who have genocidal wet dreams about them.
More proof that racism rots the mind.
Assdurratin even allies himself with Lunarblitz, OhReally & Maz Fascist. He claims to be in the tradition of Kwame Nkruman, Kwame Toure, Amilcar Cabral and other revolutionaries. Only I've actually READ these folk while still a student. He knows NOTHING about them. Whateveer my differences with Nkruman and some others, they didn't kiss racist a___ and they didn't defend capitalism---which Abdurratin clearly does.
To imagine Nkrumah or Cabral being like Abdurratin, you'd have to imagine them kissing up to British or Portuguese colonial authorities.
Cabral, Nkruman, Kwame Toure (aka Stokely Carmichael) would have some SHARP criticisms of Barack Obama. But they wouldn't be cheerleading b____ for Romney and Ron Paul the way Abdurratin is.
Notice that this devout Muslim has only contempt for other Muslims (e.g. Kush Kid, DrugsareDumb) who have a more progressive perspective.
If he were Malian he'd be a jihadist. I also recall him singing Stalin's praises. A clear totalitarian mentality. If he were white he'd be singing Hitler's praises).


-Savant




_________________

brothawolf
And not to get too further off topic here, Tyrone, blacks have tried to re-establish themselves by themselves, but as history has shown, that has always been met with resistance and terrorism resulting in them being further oppressed and suppressed because in the end White America doesn’t want black people to advance on their own which is funny considering how they always tell us to work harder.
But back on the subject, Abigail is a true example of white resentment when things don’t go their way. They say they believe in equality, but when it comes, then they get scared silly. They fear of losing their privileges err…freedoms to those they deem are unworthy.
However, this is not a case of equality. It’s a case of racial paranoia. Abagail didn’t get accepted. So, what does she do? Blame affirmative action which she has no idea what it truly is who who it truly benefits. And she is not the only one fearing of being the marginalized. (Of course white people are scared to death of being oppressed) There are cases like this all over the nation.
I find it funny that a group of people who prides itself of racial supremacy is afraid of the “inferior” types oppressing them as if they’re no understandable reason why they should be punished (We all know the reason why they don’t). Not saying they ought to be, but it just shows how broken they really are about history, reality and life itself.

 



Sunday, October 28, 2012

The Civil War & Its Aftermath Dr. John Henrik Clarke







___________________________




_____________________________________________________








_______________________________

BlackHeywoodModerator6 hours ago
This is not surprising at all . What's worse is that White America has NO justification to hate Blacks or anyone else. They've had every advantage, access and opportunity over Blacks for centuries yet they still blame Blacks and others for their failures.
When Blacks speak of past injustices we're accused of playing the "race card and being a Victim. Yes we are victims thanks to all White male government the majority of Whites elected into Congress and POTUS who created and enforced the most racist,oppressi­ve laws known to mankind. To this day White America has never been held accountable for the crimes she knowingly committed against her own Black citizens who stood beside this country and people in hope of being accepted and treated equally.
My comment is not an indictment of All White folks because many of them lost their families, friends,jobs and lives standing up for what is right and with Blacks in our quest for equality,unfort­unately the majority of White folks are not like them.They have my gratitude and respect.
Those who cry about so-called Blacks are racist against White folks I will quote Sista Souljah " We are the HATE that HATE produced". Did folks actually believed they would be embraced after centuries of oppressing and willingly disenfranchisin­g one group of citizens.

______________________________



SoultrySoulModerator1 day ago
I used this word just yesterday...crying laughing at a friends joke and I said, "D___ you're retarded"
The difference between Ann and I: She has followers of white racist that gets off disrespecting the POTUS and other Black People. Also has Black friends that share her agenda and she can proudly say, "I have Black friends"
Me...I have a following of SistahZ and BruthaZ that have a mutual understanding of the word from back in the 70's/80's along with "spastic" as to how and when to use the word.
The Title of President is to be respected, however, we see the person holding it is not - and that depends on race.

_____________________

EricaModerator7 hours agoin reply to tracy smith
Whites stole South Africa, created Apartheid, robbed her of her riches and jailed and killed thousands of Africans, the most famous one jailed being Nelson Mandela. Now he along with many whites are complaining about the Africans taking back their farm land which most still have not received due to all the red tape and yes, they are taking it by force if the whites won't give it back(which btw, are the whites who are threatening to shoot any African that tries to move them off the property which was never theirs to begin with, not the whites that comply). But he calls us a bunch of whining babies. Pay back is something else.


___________

courtneyrRModerator1 day agoin reply to blight14
keep believing that lie . 90 percent of what you so called invented was most likely ,stolen. we know this to be true and so does real history. the middle east knows this, this is why they detest the lot of you.
such a shame. keep up the lie,spread the lie until it becomes truth. go read a book that hasnt been sanctioned by public education.all great nations will fall if its people are not rooted in truth.


___________

My 3 Issues RE Alice Walker...



1} 'The Color Purple' indicates that Ms Walker seemingly has major 'issues' w [IE: a low opinion of] nearly ALL Black Men [except of course Obama].
2} Her long term 'curious' relationship w MS Gloria Steinem [MS Steinem is Walker's daughter's god-mother- even though ironically its been said MS Steinem does not believe in God]. Of course MS Steinem's MS Magazine helped hype Walker's 'The Color Purple' along w another book by a young Black woman that attacked Black men- especially Black Radicals &/or Nationalists. - PS: MS Steinem got into a 'curious' spat w Melissa Harris-Perry in 2008 RE: Obama vs Billary.
3} That Ms Walker has dis-avowed her own daughter, Rebekka, after Rebekka at age 39 - 40 decided she wanted to be a mother & stay w her son's father to help raise him. IMO this, along w point-1, is a bit much to swallow. [PS: The issue can't be that Rebekka's son's father is perhaps white {I don't know what his back-ground is} because Rebekka's own father is white & Jewish.]

______________

Note by Me: A lot of Christians do understand the Israel/Palestine situation, but they aren't shown that much on television.

By Timothy


Yeah, Walker has nothing to



Yeah, Walker has nothing to gain from calling out Obomber. And, she's old and maybe "too tired" to fight, yada, yada. You are so right about her being another co-opted Negro. But those are poor excuses especially for someone who experienced Jim Crow and the civil rights struggle.
I'm glad the major players in the civil rights movement such as MLK didn't worry about losing or gaining something and were not too old and tired to fight. I'm sure there were some senior citizens who were knee deep in the struggle. From what I see of the Walker/Jesse/CBC 60s hangers-on, MLK and company did most of the work and had all of the cajones. The hangers-on just brought up the rear and took the credit along with advantage of every benefit MLK and company's blood/sweat/tears provided.
Way back when, your life was in real danger of being lost. Today, not so much, if at all, and these jokers are too chickens___  to demand face time to get in the face of their black president, much less raise a ruckus over a laundry lists of issues that need to be addressed, or even raise more than a bit of stern criticism towards King Barry. If MLK and those preceeding him considered what they had to gain and lose, we'd still be sitting at the back of the bus today.
As for the black Bible toters making the great pilgrimage to Jerusalem, most of the crowd doesn't have a clue about what's going on between Israel and Palestine - and don't care. They may have heard something on TV but do not pay attention to any of it. Even if they paid attention, they'd be just as ignorant as they are now since the media provides govt propaganda not the truth. If it ain't on TV or in the Bible, they don't know, don't believe you if you try to enlightened them, and just don't care.
 
____________
 

We're screwed!!! The Imperial Lodge is about to haze us

This would be more appropriately posted under that picture of Obama wearing the King's Crown, check out this wild "New World Order," "Obama Deception" s___ from Glenn Greenwald.
This dude is absolutely incredible, unbelievable, "Hope and Change" my a__, if there ever was a Manchurian Candidate it's this President. It makes me go back to what he said in 08 while campaigning for President, it should have been a clarion call but stupid m***f____ were to caught up in the Melissa Perry symbolic b____:
"The Surge has Succeeded Beyond Our Wildest Dreams."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/04/barack-obama-on-the-oreil_n_124056.html
No s___. And you Mr. President have succeeded in instituting full blown facist, corptocracy beyond MY(our) wildest dreams.
It's OVER folks, we all just f___ around on the margins, its game, set, match to Obama and the New World Order.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
The only thing that will change the current Emperors sitting in the WH is the full and complete collapse of the United States and Western allies. But even then don't expect them go down without a fight. "Renewable Energy?" You gone get renewable energy because all of our asses will be walking around glowing like a light bulb when full-scale nuclear war occurs.
Vote? For what, to legitimize the current and future dictators aka U.S. Presidents?
Obama Moves to Make the 'War on Terror' Permanent
Complete with a newly coined, creepy Orwellian euphemism – 'disposition matrix' – the administration institutionalizes the most extremist powers a government can claim
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/10/24-10
The Washington Post has a crucial and disturbing story this morning by Greg Miller about the concerted efforts by the Obama administration to fully institutionalize – to make officially permanent – the most extremist powers it has exercised in the name of the war on terror.
Based on interviews with "current and former officials from the White House and the Pentagon, as well as intelligence and counterterrorism agencies", Miller reports that as "the United States' conventional wars are winding down", the Obama administration "expects to continue adding names to kill or capture lists for years" (the "capture" part of that list is little more than symbolic, as the US focus is overwhelmingly on the "kill" part). Specifically, "among senior Obama administration officials, there is broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade." As Miller puts it: "That timeline suggests that the United States has reached only the midpoint of what was once known as the global war on terrorism."
In pursuit of this goal, "White House counterterrorism adviser John O Brennan is seeking to codify the administration's approach to generating capture/kill lists, part of a broader effort to guide future administrations through the counterterrorism processes that Obama has embraced." All of this, writes Miller, demonstrates "the extent to which Obama has institutionalized the highly classified practice of targeted killing, transforming ad-hoc elements into a counterterrorism infrastructure capable of sustaining a seemingly permanent war."
"Targeted killing is now so routine that the Obama administration has spent much of the past year codifying and streamlining the processes that sustain it."
The Post article cites numerous recent developments reflecting this Obama effort, including the fact that "CIA Director David H Petraeus is pushing for an expansion of the agency's fleet of armed drones", which "reflects the agency's transformation into a paramilitary force, and makes clear that it does not intend to dismantle its drone program and return to its pre-September 11 focus on gathering intelligence." The article also describes rapid expansion of commando operations by the US Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) and, perhaps most disturbingly, the creation of a permanent bureaucratic infrastructure to allow the president to assassinate at will:
"JSOC also has established a secret targeting center across the Potomac River from Washington, current and former U.S. officials said. The elite command's targeting cells have traditionally been located near the front lines of its missions, including in Iraq and Afghanistan. But JSOC created a 'national capital region' task force that is a 15-minute commute from the White House so it could be more directly involved in deliberations about al-Qaeda lists."
The creepiest aspect of this development is the christening of a new Orwellian euphemism for due-process-free presidential assassinations: "disposition matrix". Writes Miller:
"Over the past two years, the Obama administration has been secretly developing a new blueprint for pursuing terrorists, a next-generation targeting list called the 'disposition matrix'.
"The matrix contains the names of terrorism suspects arrayed against an accounting of the resources being marshaled to track them down, including sealed indictments and clandestine operations. US officials said the database is designed to go beyond existing kill lists, mapping plans for the 'disposition' of suspects beyond the reach of American drones."
The "disposition matrix" has been developed and will be overseen by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). One of its purposes is "to augment" the "separate but overlapping kill lists" maintained by the CIA and the Pentagon: to serve, in other words, as the centralized clearinghouse for determining who will be executed without due process based upon how one fits into the executive branch's "matrix". As Miller describes it, it is "a single, continually evolving database" which includes "biographies, locations, known associates and affiliated organizations" as well as "strategies for taking targets down, including extradition requests, capture operations and drone patrols". This analytical system that determines people's "disposition" will undoubtedly be kept completely secret; Marcy Wheeler sardonically said that she was "looking forward to the government's arguments explaining why it won't release the disposition matrix to ACLU under FOIA".
This was all motivated by Obama's refusal to arrest or detain terrorist suspects, and his resulting commitment simply to killing them at will (his will). Miller quotes "a former US counterterrorism official involved in developing the matrix" as explaining the impetus behind the program this way: "We had a disposition problem."
The central role played by the NCTC in determining who should be killed – "It is the keeper of the criteria," says one official to the Post – is, by itself, rather odious. As Kade Crockford of the ACLU of Massachusetts noted in response to this story, the ACLU has long warned that the real purpose of the NCTC – despite its nominal focus on terrorism - is the "massive, secretive data collection and mining of trillions of points of data about most people in the United States".
 
 

________________


KhalidXModerator1 day ago
Roland surely could have done better than this . Sadly many of us allow them to say to us are you "using the race card" as if that allows them to end the conversation on race. You are a mental slave if you do. Ask them what is the race card? They say it but cannot explain it. Here is my definition The “race card” was created by whites. It was created to exempt a segment of white America from acknowledging and explaining the legacy of racism in this country. It’s a tactic utilized to dilute the legitimacy claims of race. Hence, a segment of whites embrace most claims of race lack substance. They assert African-Americans cry race in efforts of not staking their claim, implying they’d rather embrace mediocrity. Whites have defined its meaning through their actions. It’s a tool utilized to continue racism and not diminish it; as way to keep from facing the past; as a way of controlling the future. Study history. Read. Read Read .


 

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

More Conscious Words

http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/rbg-articles/47219-article-thomas-sankara-former-leader-burkina-faso.html

__________________

To:Bigsmoke
As I said over and over, Im gonna say it again the Bantus and Mande made 70% of AAs ancestry in US. As the articles I sent above show Igbos of Biafra made 18.6% of slaves sent to US as a whole. This means Igbos sent around 59 000 slaves to US as whole, its recorded in history books that Ibo women were likely to MATE OUTSIDE their tribe. This was the result of few Ibo males imported to US. Ibo women were likely to mate with Mande or Bantu, Akan males who were majority among slave population. So this claim about Ibo majority after 400 years doesn't hold WATER/SENSELESS.

TOTAL number of AFRICANS imported in US colonies was 317748.

Source:[PDF]A Companion to African American History
owlasylum.net/owl_underground/African_America ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
a whole, Bight of Biafra exports were 18.6 percent of the 317748 enslaved Africans recorded in the Du Bois database (Eltis et al. 1999)

Pls follow the link

http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ah...


To:Bigsmoke
How about this Obama has links to Africans slaves brought to Virginia in 1619s from his mothers side. DNA samples show that his mother side DNA matches with South Cameroonian Bantus. Who are cousins to Angolans. Most slaves to Vrginia in 1617-40 were from Angola, Bantu Africans were founder generation of AAs in US. Same thing happened in New Amsterdam/NY & NJ Anglans were founder generation of AFRO-NEW YORKERS.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/us/obamas-m...

To:Bigsmoke
An African American scholar DR JOSEPH E HOLLOWAY shows that AAs are 70% Mande and Bantu ancestry.
Mande (Senegal,Mali,Gambia,Sierra Leone,Guinea Bissau,Guinea,N Liberia)
*Bantu (Gabon,Congo Brazzaville,Democratic of Congo,Angola)

http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cpercy/course...



-Prof Awodwa

_________________

To:Sam

Despite the colonists’ attempts to deny and then destroy African linguistic heritage, more recent work, most notably by Joseph Holloway and Winifred Vass, suggests otherwise and they are able to trace a number of surviving Africanisms back to two ethnic groupings in Africa from which at least 70% of the ancestors of African Americans came from, the Mande and Bantu. The Africans from the Senegambia region (Mande speakers) were part of the greatest and most advanced of the Sudanic empires and thus were often enslaved as artisans and craftsman. According to Holloway and Vass, both the Mande and Wolof slaves were more often employed in the housework on the plantations and thus had a greater influence on white American culture. Many American children for instance would have learned African folk tales from their “mammies”, tales such as Brer Rabbit, Brer Wolf, Brer Fox, and the Uncle Remus stories which were originally Wolof folk tales brought to America by the Hausa, Fulani and Mandinka.

On the other hand, the Bantu slaves from Angola and Congo regions were employed primarily as field slaves. As a result, their impact on white culture was minimal, but isolation allowed their culture to develop without as much external interference. According to Vass and Holloway, their African past was thus able to develop into African American cooking, music (jazz, blues, spirituals, gospel), dance, language, religion, philosophy, and the arts.

As a result of both the Mande and Bantu influences through the slave experience in the U.S., Vass and Holloway compile a list of Africanisms that have entered into contemporary American English but a close examination of these words reveal a continuing attempt to culturally disparage the African heritage. Take for instance the word “banjo” which is traced to a West African stringed musical instrument called an “mbanza”. The banjo was apparently a popular musical instrument among the black population until the 1840s when it was adopted by minstrel shows who made it part of the black face acts after which it became a symbol of ridicule.

http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cpercy/course ...

To:Everyone
If u wanna see which AFRICAN ETHNICITIES were sent where pls visit this link. It shows everything from North, Central and South America, even West Indies.

Note:The some records are incomplete. Let me complete the puzzle for ya'll.
VIRGINIA
Was dominated by Biafrans at 38% and rivals were Senegambia 26.5% and Bantus 20%, then Gold Coast 16%.

SOUTH CAROLINA-GEORGIA
Dominated by Senegambia 43%
Angola-Congo 40%
Then Gold Coast 16%

LOUISIANA
Louisiana was majority SENEGAMBIAN 1719-1760 then replaced by Angola-Congo Bantus onwards 1760-1820.
Senegambia slaves in Louisiana were 30% overall and Bantus 35.6% in 1800s and around 40% in later stages. The process of removal of Mandes by Bantus in Louisiana and South carolina-Georgia is called CONGOLIZATION by Dr Kelvin Roberts in his book.

http://anthrocivitas.net/forum/showthread.php...

-Prof Awodwa

__________________________________




_____________

I don't understand why someone would move to an area known for white wealth...surround himself purposefully with ww and then complain he doesn't see bw. How phony.

And don't get me wrong, live as you please within the law but then keep your nose in the community you belong to. What bp are doing has nothing to do with those with non black partners. It actually confirms that ir couples tend tobe extremely racist...but always toward blacks.

-dame

______________________

people only being concerned with themselves is a form of terrible selfishness and these same people should not be alarmed to find that other people are like wise not concerned about them.

what should one expect? you have no concern for others and as a result they have no concern for you.

my mom once said that "no man is an island" i'll take it a step further and say that no man can make it in this world alone...not safe, secure, healthy and mentally stable.

we need each other but there is a protocol that exists on every level of this need.

the baby needs the mom, the mom needs the help and security of the father, the race needs its own people to look after one another first and foremost. this is just how the world operates.

-dragonpat

______________

 I don't disagree. My point is it isn't our job to dictate how someone should feel. Stop rewarding those who are selfish with benefits of those who sacrificed.

-dame


_____________

DICE Reply:

Anonymous
You possibly need to brush up on your American History…
White men have been banging and “loving” black women since 1675….White men were “loving” black women even before the black women could even get off those slave ships on the way here.
Why do you think so many of us carry the DNA of these beasts today?
You are really reaching and thirsty for self esteem when you think it makes you cute that your kidnapper is raping your mothers, sisters and DAUGHTERS…
But then again, women need self assurance and when they dont get it from where it should come from (DADDY), they accept it from wherever it comes from, even if it is from a white pimp…
And yes, Strom TRhurmond, Thomas Jefferson are pimps…Just because they like black p___, doesnt mean they give a d___ about black people or even see black people as full human beings in their society…
In case you havent noticed, the system of global racism and white rule is still in effect and as long as that remains the case then we are still on the plantation and
ANY SEXUAL CONTACT BETWEEN A SLAVE AND A KIDNAPPER IS RAPE AND NOT APPROPRIATE..
ANY SEXUAL CONTACT BETWEEN A PRISONER AND A WARDEN IS NOT APPROPRIATE..
ANY SEXUAL CONTACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEE AND EMPLOYERS IS NOT APPROPRIATE…
ANY SEXUAL CONTACT BETWEEN A TEACHER AND STUDENT IS NOT APPRORPRIATE…
any sexual contact between people who are on opposite poles of power dynamics is inappropriate..
Until the syetem of global white racism is REPLACED BY A SYSTEM OF JUSTICE, black people should BOYCOTT SEXUAL CONTACT WITH WHITE PEOPLE…period…..AFTER, that has been accomplished, then feel free to have sex with anybody you want…The thing, is we arent going to f___ ourselves or miscegenate ourselves out of our current situation…If that were true, we would have done it 200 years ago…
I NEVER HEARD ROBERT DENIRO SPEAK OUT ON RACISM, and put himself out on that limb for his hoes brothers, fathers and sons,,,He hasnt said a peep about Trayvon, because he just wants black p___.


________________

beautiful black woman wrote:

Kip when a black man chases and up lift other races of women and put down their own women then it does help in destroying the black community. And behaving goes for all black people who talk down on their own, including you, you should take your own advice.
 
___________
 



KIP wrote:

No, YOU take YOUR own advice.
Start with yourself instead of obsessing over who strangers are bedding. What two consenting adults choose to do in the privacy of their own choosing has absolutely NOTHING to do with what tears down an actual community. See, this is part of the problem: women such as yourself incessantly bickering over nothing. What you need to do is turn that angst against what is really doing the damage. Stop looking out and start looking in. I could care less about a brother chasing women. That's what men do and always WILL do. What I do care about is when people's kids go hungry, because the mother is too hungover to cook breakfast. What I do care about is when some woman is screaming her eyes out, because someone else's kid shot her child. What I do care about is when young men see fit to spend all day standing in front of a liquor store, but are too young to drink. What I do care about is when young men think the only way of settling a dispute is with gun violence. What I've been touch by is when parents are too coked out to care for their own kid, so she runs away and ends up adopted.
You also sound like someone without an absolute clue about what the hell is going on.
We all understand that but its not just about killing, and drugs, and other things you have mentioned it also has alot to do with how we all treat each other. How do you think a black community will survive if black people such as yourself always treat your own badly?? If this doesnt stop happening we will no longer have a black community. And yes once again it does have some thing to do with black men chasing other women and putting down their own. You can date who you want and so can other black men but then they dog out their own women and children that puts a huge dent in the community as well. It takes both men and women to build a strong community not just the women. Too many brothas are to worried about how many different types of women they have have sex with other than trying to make a change. And you can go on and on and on about how its thats not whats causing the down fall but we all know thats part of the reason. Seems like you dont get it and its funny how other brothas on this forum understand what were saying except you? Your too busy hating on black women and not giving a damn about what others think instead of trying to understand other people you insult them. Thats why I dont like you never have never will. You are part of the cancer to our community. I still dont understand why you come here.

-beautiful black woman

_______________________


The Ibos constituted about about 25% of the slave population in the US. There was only 480,000-500,000 Africans brought to the US. This is about 5% of the total Africans in the Atlantic Slave Trade.
Yes I would agree that Igbos have a big influence on AA society. However, we must not ignore the other very large groups, the Angolans and the Kongos. These groups had a significant contribution to AA socity. They constituted about 30%. So to say that the majority of AAs have Ibo ancestry is incorrect. To say a relatively large percentage of AAs have Ibo ancestry is more valid.
I would suggest y'all read Michael Gomez's Exchanging Our Country Marks and Dreams of Africa in Alabama by Slyvaine Diouf.
Note:
My sister has slanted eyes, and we would make fun of her that she must have some Asian in her. I was ignorant then. When I was in Nigeria and I was on a beach one sunday afternoon, I saw many slanted eyed African Hausa women. I died laughing and had to inform my family.

-Big Sistah Pat

http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TNTGIHD5TE7O93KOU


_________

I hear you...it's that logical man talk and as usual man logic has its own idea.

I hope that when women speak men aren't thinking she is TRYING to make me agree with her.

Everyone men and women should want to UNDERSTAND each other..

The forcing ie. feeling like anyone is trying to take something from you is founded in fear more than fact.

Each of us has our own power...no need to compete because we each are just half of the magic we make together.

Men work too hard to make man logic work for women..I could say you want women to turn into your best bud(I can't think of the term that is the perfect guy friend term)

Lower the threat to code orange..keep an open mind and trust...the right person of course because I'm not going to say there aren't women out there with heaven forbid penis envy..because that is what came to my mind not emasculation.

Why do folk have to get old to appreciate that's its a blessing we are different and don't think the same.

-lovelyone